MetaBOT at 13:50, 8 July 2023

2023-07-08T13:50:12Z

New page

{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2019}}
{{Use Indian English|date=June 2019}}
{{Infobox election
| election_name = 1920 Madras Presidency legislative council election
| country = British India
| type = parliamentary
| ongoing = no
| previous_election =
| previous_year =
| next_election = 1923 Madras Presidency legislative council election
| next_year = '''1923'''
| election_date = November 1920
| seats_for_election = 98 seats in [[Madras Legislative Council]]
| image1 = [[File:Theagaroya Chetty.jpg|130x130px]]
| leader1 = [[Theagaroya Chetty|P. Theagaroya Chetty]]
| party1 = Justice Party (India)
| leaders_seat1 =
| seats1 = 63
| seat_change1 =
| popular_vote1 =
| percentage1 =
| swing1 =
| image2 =
| leader2 =
| party2 = Independent (politician)
| leaders_seat2 =
| seats2 = 18
| seat_change2 =
| popular_vote2 =
| percentage2 =
| swing2 =
| title = [[Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu|Chief Minister]]
| before_election =
| bofore_party =
| after_election = [[A. Subbarayalu Reddiar]]
| after_party = Justice Party (India)
| majority_seats = 50
}}
The '''first legislative council election''' to [[Madras Presidency]] after the establishment of [[Diarchy in Madras Presidency|dyarchical]] system of government by the [[Government of India Act 1935|Government of India Act, 1919]], was held in November 1920. [[Indian National Congress]] boycotted the election due to its participation in the [[Non-cooperation movement]]. The election occurred during the early stages of non-Brahmin movement and the major issue of the election was anti-[[Brahmin]]ism. [[Justice Party (India)|Justice party]] won the election with no significant opposition and [[A. Subbarayalu Reddiar]] became the first Chief Minister of the presidency.

==Government of India Act, 1919==
Based on the recommendations of the [[Montagu–Chelmsford Reforms|Montague-Chelmsford]] report, the [[Government of India Act 1919|Government of India Act of 1919]] was enacted. The Act enlarged the provincial legislative councils and increased the number of elected members more than nominated members and company officials. It introduced a system of [[dyarchy]] in the Provinces. Although this Act brought about representative Government in India, the Governor was empowered with overriding powers. It classified the subjects as belonging to either the Centre or the Provinces. The [[Governor-General of India|Governor General]] could override any law passed by the Provincial councils. It brought about the concept of "Partial Responsible Government" in the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two categories - reserved and transferred. Education, Sanitation, Local self-government, Agriculture and Industries were listed as the transferred subjects. Law, Finance, Revenue and Home affairs were the reserved subjects. The provincial council could decide the budget in so far it related to the transferred subjects. Executive machinery dealing with those subjects was placed under the direct control of provincial legislature. However, the provincial legislature and the ministers did not have any control over the reserved subjects, which came under the Governor and his Executive council.<ref name="Krishnaswamy">{{cite book | title=The role of Madras Legislature in the freedom struggle, 1861-1947| author=S. Krishnaswamy| year=1989| pages=72–83| publisher=People's Pub. House (New Delhi) }}</ref><ref name="tnassembly">{{cite web|url=http://www.assembly.tn.gov.in/history/history.htm |title=The State Legislature - Origin and Evolution |access-date=17 December 2009 |publisher=[[Tamil Nadu]] Government |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100413233934/http://www.assembly.tn.gov.in/history/history.htm |archive-date=13 April 2010 }}</ref><ref name="legislatures">{{cite web|url=http://legislativebodiesinindia.gov.in/States/tamilnadu/tamilnadu-w.htm|title=Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly|access-date=17 December 2009|publisher=Government of India|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100102222439/http://legislativebodiesinindia.gov.in/States/tamilnadu/tamilnadu-w.htm|archive-date=2 January 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="rajaraman1">{{cite book | title=The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37| last=Rajaraman| first=P. | year=1988| pages=206| publisher=Poompozhil Publishers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GGMmAAAAMAAJ}}</ref> It introduced for the first time bicameralism and direct elections in the country. Thus the Indian legislative council was replaced by the bicameral legislature consisting of an Upper House (Council Of State) and a Lower House (Legislative Assembly).

== Constituencies ==
The [[Madras Legislative Council]] had a total of 127 members in addition to the [[Ex officio member|'' ex - officio'' members]] of the Governor's Executive Council. Out of the 127, 98 were elected from 61 constituencies of the presidency. The constituencies comprised three arbitrary divisions - 1)communal constituencies such as non-Muhammadan urban, non-Muhammadan rural, non-Brahman urban, [[Islam in India|Mohamaddan]] urban, Mohamaddan rural, Indian Christian, European and Anglo-Indian 2)special constituencies such as landholders, Universities, planters and trade associations (South India Chamber of Commerce & Nattukottai Nagarathar Association) and 3) territorial constituencies. 28 of the constituencies were reserved for non-[[Brahmin|Brahmans]]. 29 members were nominated, out of whom a maximum of 19 would be government officials, 5 would represent the [[Paraiyar]], [[Pallar]], [[Valluvar]], [[Mala (caste)|Mala]], [[Madiga]], [[Sakkiliar]], Thottiyar, Cheruman and [[Pulayar|Holeya]] communities and 1 would represent the "backward tracts". Including the Executive Council members, the total strength of the legislature was 134.<ref name="Krishnaswamy"/><ref name="tnassembly"/><ref name="legislatures"/><ref name="act1919">{{cite book | title=The Govt of India ACT 1919 Rules Thereunder and Govt Reports 1920| first=H.N.|last=Mithra| year=2009| pages=186–199| publisher=BiblioBazaar|isbn=978-1-113-74177-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aw5r4QyRijMC&pg=RA2-PA186}}</ref>

== Electorate and polling ==
The first general election was held during November 1920.<ref name="rajaraman2"/> At the time of the election, Madras presidency had a population of 40 million people. The franchise was limited based on property qualifications.<ref name="act1919"/> 1,248,156 persons were eligible to vote, among whom 303,558 actually cast their votes. The [[Indian National Congress]] boycotted the election due to its participation in the [[Non-cooperation movement]]. ''[[The Hindu]]'' reported that polling was as low as 12% in some constituencies and no constituencies reported polling higher than 25%.<ref name="Krishnaswamy"/> The city of Madras reported the highest turnout with 52% polling and [[Mylapore]], a traditionally a Brahmin area had an even higher turnout. The turnout was varied in rural areas, impacted by rain and flooding. The average turnout was 24.9% all over the Presidency. The ''Madras Mail'' reported that the turnout was low compared to elections for British parliament, but nonetheless, an impressive demonstration of growth of political consciousness.<ref name="Irschick">{{cite book | title=Political and Social Conflict in South India; The non-Brahman movement and Tamil Separatism, 1916-1929| author=Eugene F. Irschick| year=1969| pages=178–180| publisher=University of California Press}}</ref>

== Results ==
In the absence of significant opposition, the Justice party was able to win 63 seats.<ref>Most of the candidates did not declare their party affiliation before the election. Only after the results were announced they declared themselves as Justicites.{{cite book|last=Hamsapriya|first=A|title=Role of the opposition in the Madras legislature 1921-1939|year=1981|publisher=Madras University|pages=73|url=http://dspace.vidyanidhi.org.in:8080/dspace/bitstream/2009/3327/5/MAU-1981-035-4.pdf|access-date=1 August 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004015754/http://dspace.vidyanidhi.org.in:8080/dspace/bitstream/2009/3327/5/MAU-1981-035-4.pdf|archive-date=4 October 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> Party wise distribution of elected and non elected members:<ref name="Irschick"/><ref name="Saroja">{{cite book | title=March to freedom in Madras Presidency, 1916-1947| author=Saroja Sundararajan| year=1989| pages=329–332| publisher=Madras : Lalitha Publications}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=left valign=top|Party
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Elected
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Nominated and ''ex officio''
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Total
|-
|align=left| [[Justice party (India)|Justice Party]]
|align=center| 63
|align=center| 0
|align=center| 63
|-
|align=left| [[Indian National Congress]]
|align=center| Did not contest
|align=center| Did not contest
|align=center| Did not contest
|-
|align=left| Independent (politician)
|align=center| 18
|align=center| 0
|align=center| 18
|-
|align=left| Anti-ministerial
|align=center| 17
|align=center| 0
|align=center| 17
|-
|align=left| Officials
|align=center| 0
|align=center| 11
|align=center| 11
|-
|align=left| Non-Officials
|align=center| 0
|align=center| 18
|align=center| 18
|-
|align=left| '''Total'''
|align=center| 98
|align=center| 29
|align=center| 127
|}
The Justice party claimed the support of 18 non elected members bringing up its strength to 81 in the council.<ref name="rajaraman2">{{cite book | title=The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37| last=Rajaraman| first=P. | year=1988| pages=212–220| publisher=Poompozhil Publishers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GGMmAAAAMAAJ}}</ref>

==Analysis==
The following table shows communal distribution of the elected and non-elected members.<ref name="Irschick"/><ref name="Saroja"/>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=left valign=top|Party
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Elected
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Nominated and ''ex officio''
!style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Total
|-
|align=left| [[Brahmin|Brahmans]]
|align=center| 17
|align=center| 5
|align=center| 22
|-
|align=left| non-[[Brahmin|Brahmans]]
|align=center| 57
|align=center| 8
|align=center| 65
|-
|align=left| Depressed classes
|align=center| 0
|align=center| 5
|align=center| 5
|-
|align=left| Mohammadans
|align=center| 13
|align=center| 1
|align=center| 14
|-
|align=left| Indian Christians
|align=center| 5
|align=center| 1
|align=center| 6
|-
|align=left| Europeans and Anglo-Indians
|align=center| 6
|align=center| 9
|align=center| 15
|-
|align=left| '''Total'''
|align=center| 98
|align=center| 29
|align=center| 127
|}

According to P. Rajaraman, the victory of the Justice party can be attributed to three factors - the election boycott of the Congress, which left the Justice party without any serious opponent, the vigorous campaign of Justice leaders and reservation of seats to non-brahman members.<ref name="rajaraman2"/>

== Government formation ==
At first, [[Freeman Freeman-Thomas, 1st Marquess of Willingdon|Governor Willington]] invited the wealthy [[Theagaroya Chetty|P. Theagaroya Chetty]], the leader of the justice party to form the government. He refused the offer as he did not like to be paid a salary from people's taxes. He recommended that A. Subbarayalu Reddiar, [[Ramarayaningar]] (Raja of Panagal) and [[Kurma Venkata Reddy Naidu]], all [[Telugu people|Telugu]] members, be made ministers. Reddiar was appointed as the Chief Minister and as the minister in charge of Education, Public works, Excise & Registration. Ramarayaningar became the minister of local self-government & Public health, while Venkata Reddy Naidu was given the Development portfolio. The ministers assumed office on 17 December 1920. [[Perungavur Rajagopalachari]] was appointed as the President of the legislative council and Edwin Periyanayakam, [[Arcot Ramasamy Mudaliar]] & [[P. Subbarayan]] were made council secretaries. [[C. P. Ramaswami Iyer]] was appointed as the Advocate General.<ref name="rajaraman2"/><ref name="Saroja"/> The Governor's Executive Council consisted of Sir Lionel Davidson (member for Home), [[Charles Todhunter|Sir Charles Todhunter]] (Finance), [[Muhammad Habibullah]] (Revenue) and [[S. Srinivasa Iyengar]] (Law).<ref name="whoswho">{{cite book | title=The Times of India directory and year book including who's who| year=1922| pages=55| publisher=Bennett & Coleman Ltd|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NWQLAAAAIAAJ}}</ref> On 11 July 1921, Raja of Panagal took over as Chief Minister when Subbarayalu Reddiar resigned on health grounds and [[A. P. Patro]], an Orissa lawyer was appointed as the minister of Education.<ref name="Krishnaswamy"/><ref name="encyclopediapoliticalpartiesp179">{{cite book | title=Encyclopaedia of Political Parties| last=Ralhan| first=O. P. | year=2002| pages=179–80| publisher=Anmol Publications PVT. LTD| isbn=978-81-7488-865-5}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | title=Competitive elections in developing countries| author=[[Myron Weiner]], Ergun Özbudun| year=1987| pages=61| isbn=0-8223-0685-9}}</ref> The council was dissolved at the end of its term on 11 September 1923.

==Impact==
{{see also|Raja of Panagal#As Chief Minister of Madras}}
The Justice party which came into existence in 1916 was able to capture power on social development and non-Brahmin platform. It would go on to rule Madras till the [[1937 Madras Presidency legislative assembly election|1937 elections]] (with an interlude during 1926–30). Noting the significance of its victory, the Official review of the Government of India (1921–22) said:

{{quotation|For the first time in the history of India, the lower castes of Madras have asserted themselves against the intellectual oligarchy of the upper caste and have seized political power in their own hands...The first bulwark of caste dominance in political matters has been stormed as a result of the recent constitutional changes<ref name="rajaraman2"/>}}

Some of the legislative initiatives of the first Justice Government have had a lasting impact and are still in practice in one form or another. On 16 September 1921, the Justice government passed the first communal government order (G. O. # 613), thereby becoming the first elected body in the Indian legislative history to legislate [[Reservation in India|reservations]], which have since become standard policy in India.<ref name="Statesman">{{cite news|title=Tamil Nadu swims against the tide |url=http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=4&id=155652&usrsess=1 |work=The Statesman |access-date=2009-12-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090114090110/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=4&id=155652&usrsess=1 |archive-date=14 January 2009 }}</ref><ref name="reservations_history">{{cite news|last=Murugan |first=N. |title=RESERVATION (Part-2) |date=9 October 2006 |url=http://indiainteracts.com/columnist/2006/10/09/RESERVATION-Part2/ |work=National |access-date=2009-12-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108054013/http://indiainteracts.com/columnist/2006/10/09/RESERVATION-Part2/ |archive-date=8 January 2009 }}</ref><ref name="rajaraman3">{{cite book | title=The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37| last=Rajaraman| first=P. | year=1988| pages=255–260| publisher=Poompozhil Publishers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GGMmAAAAMAAJ}}</ref> Similarly, the Madras Hindu Religious Endowment Act, introduced on 18 December 1922, brought many of the Hindu Temples under the direct control of the state government. This Act, which was eventually passed by the second Justice Government in 1925, set the precedent for several later Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR & CE) Acts and the current policy of the state of [[Tamil Nadu]].<ref name="rajaraman3"/><ref name="hrce">{{cite web|title=The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department |url=http://www.hrce.tn.nic.in/ |work=Department of HR & CE |publisher=Government of Tamil Nadu |access-date=2009-12-26 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106092251/http://www.hrce.tn.nic.in/ |archive-date=2010-01-06 }}</ref>

The Government of India Act of 1919 had restricted women from becoming legislators. The first Justice Government reversed this policy by moving a resolution in the council on 1 April 1921. The qualifications for becoming a member of the council were made gender neutral. This resolution cleared the way for [[Muthulakshmi Reddi|Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddi]]'s nomination to the council in 1926, when she became the first woman to become a member of any legislature in India.<ref name="rajaraman4">{{cite book | title=The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37| last=Rajaraman| first=P. | year=1988| pages=264| publisher=Poompozhil Publishers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GGMmAAAAMAAJ}}</ref> The [[Mid-day Meal Scheme]], was first introduced in 1920 by the Madras Corporation with the approval of the legislative council, as a breakfast scheme in a corporation school at Thousand Lights, [[Chennai|Madras]]. Later it was expanded to four more schools. This was the precursor to the free noon meal schemes introduced by [[K. Kamaraj]] in 1960's and expanded by [[M. G. Ramachandran]] in the 1980s.<ref name="rajaraman5">{{cite book | title=The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37| last=Rajaraman| first=P. | year=1988| pages=237| publisher=Poompozhil Publishers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GGMmAAAAMAAJ}}</ref>

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

{{Tamil Nadu assembly elections|state=expanded}}

{{#seo:
|keywords=Elections in Madras Presidency, Provincial Assembly elections in British India
|description=
}}

[[Category:1920 elections in India|Madras]]
[[Category:Elections in Madras Presidency]]
[[Category:Provincial Assembly elections in British India]]

1920 Madras Presidency Legislative Council election - Revision history

MetaBOT at 13:50, 8 July 2023