<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://indianpedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Abhava</id>
	<title>Abhava - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://indianpedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Abhava"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://indianpedia.org/index.php?title=Abhava&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-31T21:37:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://indianpedia.org/index.php?title=Abhava&amp;diff=84391&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>&gt;Marcocapelle at 08:30, 17 April 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://indianpedia.org/index.php?title=Abhava&amp;diff=84391&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-04-17T08:30:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Hinduism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; means [[non-existence]], [[negation]], [[nothing]] or absence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy|author=John A.Grimes|date=17 October 1996|publisher=SUNY Press|page=3|isbn=9780791430682|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=eP5p0ev3nJEC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is the negative of Bhava which means being, becoming, existing or appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
Uddayana divides &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Padārtha]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Categories) into &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Bhava]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ([[existence]]) which is real, and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ([[non-existence]]) which is not real. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Dravya]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ([[Matter|substance]]), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Guṇa]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (quality), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Karma]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ([[Social actions|action]]), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Samanya&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (community or generality), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Visesa&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (particularity or partimerity) and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Samavaya&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ([[inherence]]) are the marks of existence. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; has not been categorically defined by the [[Vaisheshika]] School of [[Hindu philosophy]] but is of four kinds viz – 1) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pragabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e. Prior non-existence, 2) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pradhvamsabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e. Posterior non-existence, 3) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Atyantabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e.  Absolute non-existence, and 4) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Anyonyābhāva|Anyonyabhava]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e. Mutual non-existence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pragabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e. Prior non-existence, is the non-existence of an effect in its material cause before production; it has a beginning it has an end because it is destroyed by the production of the effect. Without prior non-existence there cannot be an effect.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pradhvamsabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e.Posterior non-existence, is the non-existence of an effect by its destruction; as such it has a beginning but no end i.e. it cannot be destroyed.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Atyantabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e. Absolute non-existence, or absolute negation is non-existence in all times i.e. denial of an absolutely non-existent entity in all times and in all places. It is the state of absolute abstraction.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Anyonyābhāva|Anyonyabhava]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; i.e. Mutual non-existence, is denial of identity between two things, which have specific nature. [[Negation]] other than mutual negation is negation of relation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The process with which the sound value collapses into the point value of the gap existing between the first and the next syllable of the first letter of the [[Rigveda]], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Agnim&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pradhvamsabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the silent point of all possibilities within the gap is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Atyantabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the structuring dynamics of what happens within the gap &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Anyonyābhāva|Anyonyabhava]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and the mechanics by which the sound emerges from the point value of the gap i.e. emergence of the following syllable, is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Pragabhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; this mechanism is inherent in both syllables.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Biographical Plays about Famous Artists|author=Daniel Meyer Dinkgrafe|year=2005|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Press|page=89|isbn=9781904303473|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=wR50GEyHk-QC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA89}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Vaisheshika]], the [[Nyaya]], the Bhatta [[Mimamsa]] and [[Dvaita]] schools hold &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as a distinct category. Recognised as a reality by the Nyaya school, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is often stated to be the reality of the greatest moment in the pluralistic universe and is connected with [[Moksha|Mukti]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World Vol.1|author=Ganga Ram Garg|year=1992|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|page=96|isbn=9788170223740|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=w9pmo51lRnYC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA96}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is a relative word, for there can be &amp;#039;&amp;#039;abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; only when previously there is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;bhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; moreover it is an event occurring in time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=PrasannapadaE|author=Theodor Stcherbatsky|year=1989|page=28|isbn=9788120805293|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=itTFXt6ZmVQC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA28}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Nagarjunian Disputations|author=Thomas E. Wood|date=January 1994|publisher=University of Hawai Press|page=180|isbn=9780824816094|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jHlvuNFxUlYC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA180}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Nyaya and the Siddhantin maintain that the cognition of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is due to perception involving special kind of contact or sense contact.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Encyclopaedia of Saivism|author=Swami Parmeshwaranand|year=2004|publisher=Sarup &amp;amp;Sons|page=40|isbn=9788176254274|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8ro-8reHVgoC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA40}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is that unmanifest level from where the concrete &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Bhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; arises or emerges. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Mirror of Consciousness|author=Anna J. Bonshek|year=2001|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=194|isbn=9788120817746|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sT13ws7RKgYC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA194}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Vasubandhu]] has referred to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Sunyata]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039; having the characteristic of the own-being of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, rather than a characteristic consisting of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;bhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; which [[Sthiramati]] observes is in fact not redundant, which means &amp;#039;&amp;#039;abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; does not negate &amp;#039;&amp;#039;bhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=The Buddhist Philosophy of the Middle|author=David S. Ruegg|date=10 April 2010|publisher=Wisdom Publications|page=74|isbn=9780861719365|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LFSPAtt7OesC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA75}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; refers to particular entities and not to [[Being]] ; it is a theoretical or logical denial of the existence of some particular impossibility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Global History of Philosophy:The Axial Age Vol.1|author=John C. Plott|year=1993|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=163|isbn=9788120801585|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ODPthacrp_cC&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA163}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The acceptance of abhava as an independent padartha having ontological reality of its own is a peculiar feature of Indian philosophical tradition. [[Dharmakirti]] considered &amp;#039;&amp;#039;abhava&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[anumana]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. He had brought in the idea of imaginary presence of that whose absence was apprehended in order to explain the specificity of the absence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Contrary Thinking|author=Daya Krishna|date=20 September 2011|page=125|isbn=9780199795550|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a44AHKGef64C&amp;amp;q=abhava&amp;amp;pg=PA125}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Indian philosophy|state=collapsed}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hindu philosophical concepts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Buddhist philosophical concepts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>&gt;Marcocapelle</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>