<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://indianpedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Big_Tech</id>
	<title>Big Tech - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://indianpedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Big_Tech"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://indianpedia.org/index.php?title=Big_Tech&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-30T16:20:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://indianpedia.org/index.php?title=Big_Tech&amp;diff=550871&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Adarshatva at 10:21, 10 June 2026</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://indianpedia.org/index.php?title=Big_Tech&amp;diff=550871&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-06-10T10:21:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Short description|Largest and most influential technology companies in the world}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Use American English|date=July 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10 Largest Corporations by Market Capitalization.png|thumb|400x400px|The largest corporations by market capitalisation in 2022, with the &amp;quot;Big Five&amp;quot; tech companies in green]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Big Tech&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; refers to the dominant United States-based technology conglomerates, primarily [[Alphabet Inc.]] ([[Google]]), [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]], [[Apple Inc.|Apple]], [[Meta Platforms]] ([[Facebook]]), and [[Microsoft]], that control substantial segments of the global digital economy, encompassing search engines, e-commerce, social media, operating systems, and cloud computing services.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://emeritus.org/blog/technology-big-tech/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://growthrocks.com/blog/big-five-tech-companies-acquisitions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These firms have accumulated extraordinary market power, with their combined market capitalisations exceeding fifteen trillion United States dollars as of mid-2025, facilitating rapid innovation in artificial intelligence, mobile computing, and data analytics while transforming consumer behaviour and economic structures across the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/05/tech-megacaps-worth-market-cap.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://companiesmarketcap.com/tech/largest-tech-companies-by-market-cap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rise of these technology giants stems from network effects and economies of scale inherent to digital platforms, driving breakthroughs such as widespread internet accessibility and algorithmic personalisation, while simultaneously attracting criticism for restricting competition through acquisitions and exclusionary practices. United States antitrust authorities have pursued significant legal actions against Google for monopolising search and advertising markets and against Amazon for predatory pricing and vendor coercion, highlighting established connections between their structural dominance and diminished market entry opportunities for competing firms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/09/ftc-sues-amazon-illegally-maintaining-monopoly-power&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-prevails-landmark-antitrust-case-against-google&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-wins-significant-remedies-against-google&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond economic considerations, Big Tech&amp;#039;s influence extends into politics and public discourse, where platforms have implemented content moderation at scale, frequently aligning with institutional preferences that empirical research indicates disproportionately targets conservative expressions, as documented in declassified internal records and congressional investigations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-cover-up-big-tech-the-swamp-and-mainstream-media-coordinated-to-censor-americans-free-speech-%25EF%25BF%25BC/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Public opinion surveys confirm widespread perceptions of excessive political influence and viewpoint discrimination by these entities, underscoring the tensions between private governance of information flows and democratic principles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/04/29/americans-views-of-technology-companies-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite defences based on voluntary terms of service, such practices have stimulated debates regarding regulatory interventions to prevent paternalistic overreach without impeding technological advancement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.brookings.edu/articles/regulating-free-speech-on-social-media-is-dangerous-and-futile/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nicknames ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Acronyms ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Various acronyms including &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;FANG&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;FAANG&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;GAFA&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;GAFAM&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;MAGA&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;MAMAA&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; have been employed to refer to Big Tech companies. Alphabet (previously Google) may be represented by G, and Meta (formerly Facebook) may be represented by F.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=October 24, 2019 |title=What are the Four Big Tech Companies in the US? |url=https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-big-four-tech-companies-in-the-us.html |access-date=January 27, 2020 |website=WorldAtlas}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=NYSE FANG+ Index |url=https://www.theice.com/fangplus |access-date=2026-01-18 |website=www.theice.com |language=en}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=FAANG: Beyond the Core: Exploring FAANG: Stocks and Their Impact |url=https://fastercapital.com/content/FAANG---Beyond-the-Core--Exploring-FAANG--Stocks-and-Their-Impact.html |access-date=2026-01-18 |website=FasterCapital |language=en}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cnbc mamaa&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Stankiewicz |first=Kevin |date=October 29, 2021 |title=&amp;#039;Bye-bye FAANG, hello MAMAA&amp;#039;—Cramer reveals a new acronym after Facebook&amp;#039;s name change |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/29/cramer-new-acronym-to-replace-faang-after-facebook-name-change-to-meta.html |access-date=October 30, 2021 |website=CNBC}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The acronym FANG was introduced in 2013 by Jim Cramer to denote Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, and Google.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cnbc cramer 2013&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Brodie |first=Lee |date=February 5, 2013 |title=Cramer: Does Your Portfolio Have FANGs? |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2013/02/05/cramer-does-your-portfolio-have-fangs.html |access-date=November 9, 2021 |website=[[CNBC]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cramer described these companies as &amp;quot;totally dominant in their markets.&amp;quot; He explained that the four companies were positioned to &amp;quot;take a bite out of&amp;quot; the declining market, creating a double meaning for the acronym, according to his colleague at RealMoney.com, Bob Lang.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cnbc cramer 2013&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Grant |first=Kinsey |date=September 26, 2017 |title=FANG Stocks Are Getting Their Own Index |work=TheStreet |url=https://www.thestreet.com/story/14320244/1/fang-stocks-index.html |publisher=[[TheStreet.com|The Street]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fool&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Frankel |first=Matthew |date=September 29, 2017 |title=What Are the FANG Stocks? |url=https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/09/29/ask-a-fool-what-are-the-fang-stocks.aspx |access-date=August 11, 2018 |work=[[Motley Fool]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cramer expanded FANG to FAANG in 2017, incorporating Apple into the list because its revenue levels qualified it as a potential [[Fortune 500]] company.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Gurdus |first=Lizzy |date=May 1, 2017 |title=Cramer: Disney, Apple and the fate of FANG |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/01/cramer-disney-apple-and-the-fate-of-fang.html |access-date=November 9, 2021 |website=[[CNBC]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following Facebook&amp;#039;s rebranding to Meta Platforms in October 2021, and the 2015 establishment of Google&amp;#039;s holding company Alphabet, Cramer proposed replacing FAANG with MAMAA, substituting [[Netflix]] with Microsoft as Netflix&amp;#039;s valuation had fallen behind the other companies. With Microsoft included, these companies each achieved valuations exceeding nine hundred billion United States dollars, compared to Netflix&amp;#039;s three hundred and ten billion. In November 2021, The Motley Fool suggested &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;MANAMANA&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (a reference to the 1968 song &amp;quot;Mah Nà Mah Nà&amp;quot;) as an acronym representing Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Nvidia, and Adobe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Mann |first=Bill |date=November 5, 2021 |title=FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA |url=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/ |access-date=April 22, 2022 |website=The Motley Fool}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internationally, [[Baidu]], [[Alibaba Group|Alibaba]], [[Tencent]], and [[Xiaomi]], collectively known as [[BATX]], are regarded as Chinese competitors to Big Tech. In 2019, Amy Webb identified the Big Five (Google, Meta, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft) alongside [[IBM]], Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;G-MAFIA BAT&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite magazine |last=Sterling |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Sterling |date=March 15, 2019 |title=The Big Nine G-MAFIA BAT |url=https://www.wired.com/beyond-the-beyond/2019/03/big-nine-g-mafia-bat/ |access-date=August 10, 2019 |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Big Four ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{anchor|GAFA}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Big Five ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{anchor|GAFAM}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Big Five tech companies}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Magnificent Seven ===&lt;br /&gt;
A collective known as the Magnificent Seven incorporates Nvidia and Tesla alongside the original Big Five based on their substantial contributions to the S&amp;amp;P 500 index. In 2023, the Magnificent Seven represented approximately two-thirds of the S&amp;amp;P 500&amp;#039;s total gains.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Krauskopf 2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Krauskopf |first=Lewis |date=December 29, 2023 |title=Can sizzling Magnificent Seven trade keep powering US stocks in 2024? |url=https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/can-sizzling-magnificent-seven-trade-keep-powering-us-stocks-2024-2023-12-28/ |access-date=February 27, 2024 |website=Reuters}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Colvin |first=Geoff |title=A $803 billion company most people have never heard of just knocked Tesla out of the Magnificent 7 |url=https://fortune.com/2024/10/05/broadcom-tesla-magnificent-7-companies-market-cap/ |access-date=2025-09-17 |website=Fortune}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Magnificent 7 Stocks: What You Need To Know |url=https://www.investopedia.com/magnificent-seven-stocks-8402262 |access-date=2025-09-17 |website=Investopedia}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Companies ranked by Market Cap - CompaniesMarketCap.com |url=https://companiesmarketcap.com/ |access-date=2025-09-17 |website=companiesmarketcap.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Throughout the year, the Magnificent Seven delivered a remarkable 107% return on investment, which analysts attributed to the artificial intelligence boom and anticipated interest rate reductions by the Federal Reserve.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=May 30, 2023 |title=The &amp;#039;Magnificent Seven&amp;#039; tech stocks drive markets higher as AI mania grips investors |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-magnificent-seven-tech-stocks-drive-markets-higher-as-ai-mania-grips-investors-123029634.html |access-date=February 28, 2024 |website=Yahoo Finance}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By January 2024, the Magnificent Seven constituted 29% of the S&amp;amp;P 500&amp;#039;s market capitalisation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last1=Russell |first1=Karl |last2=Rennison |first2=Joe |date=January 22, 2024 |title=These Seven Tech Stocks Are Driving the Market |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/22/business/magnificent-seven-stocks-tech.html |access-date=February 27, 2024 |website=The New York Times}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In February 2024, as the Magnificent Seven neared a combined valuation of thirteen trillion United States dollars,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Cingari |first=Piero |title=Magnificent 7 Eye $13-Trillion Market Cap: &amp;#039;They Are Sucking All The Air Out Of The Universe,&amp;#039; Wall Street Veteran Says |url=https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/02/36941399/magnificent-7-eye-13-trillion-market-cap-they-are-sucking-all-the-air-out-of-the-un |access-date=February 28, 2024 |website=Benzingaglish}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Deutsche Bank]] observed that the group&amp;#039;s market value surpassed that of the total stock market in every country worldwide except Japan, China, and the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CNBC 2-19-2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Smith |first=Elliot |date=February 19, 2024 |title=Magnificent 7 profits now exceed almost every country in the world. Should we be worried? |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/19/magnificent-7-profits-now-exceed-almost-every-country-in-the-world-should-we-be-worried.html |access-date=February 19, 2024 |publisher=CNBC}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By mid-2024, Morgan Stanley reported that the Magnificent Seven accounted for 31% of the S&amp;amp;P 500.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Imbert |first=Fred |date=July 1, 2024 |title=Morgan Stanley says Magnificent Seven now make up 31% of the S&amp;amp;P 500 |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/01/morgan-stanley-says-magnificent-seven-now-make-up-31percent-of-the-sp-500.html |access-date=April 17, 2024 |publisher=CNBC}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some analysts voiced apprehension that the group&amp;#039;s extreme concentration could precipitate a market correction similar to the dot-com crash or the 1929 market collapse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Iacurci |first=Greg |date=July 1, 2024 |title=Is the U.S. stock market too &amp;#039;concentrated&amp;#039;? Here&amp;#039;s what to know |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/01/how-magnificent-7-affects-sp-500-stock-market-concentration.html |access-date=July 1, 2024 |publisher=CNBC}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other analysts contended that these companies could maintain their outperformance relative to the broader market. On August 5, 2024, the Magnificent Seven experienced a brief loss of one trillion United States dollars before swiftly recovering, with the decline attributed to unfavourable economic data and mounting concerns regarding excessive investment in artificial intelligence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last1=Goswami |first1=Rohan |last2=Levy |first2=Ari |date=August 5, 2024 |title=$1 trillion wipeout: Market rout punishes megacap tech |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/05/1-trillion-wipeout-market-rout-punishes-mega-cap-tech.html |access-date=August 5, 2024 |publisher=CNBC}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moniker Magnificent Seven was introduced in May 2023 by Bank of America analyst Michael Hartnett as a reference to the 1960 film of the same name, and was subsequently popularised by Jim Cramer on his programme Mad Money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Adarshatva</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>