WikiDwarf at 16:44, 3 February 2022

2022-02-03T16:44:00Z

New page

{{short description|Form of protest}}
{{Revolution sidebar}}
{{Other uses}}
A '''boycott''' is an act of [[nonviolent resistance|nonviolent]], voluntary and intentional abstention from using or buying a product, or dealing with a person, organization, or country as an expression of protest, usually for moral, [[society|social]], [[politics|political]], or [[Environmentalism|environmental]] reasons. The purpose of a boycott is to inflict some [[economic loss]] on the target, or to indicate a moral outrage, to try to compel the target to alter an objectionable behavior.

The word is named after Captain [[Charles Boycott]], agent of an absentee landlord in Ireland, against whom the tactic was successfully employed after a suggestion by Irish nationalist leader [[Charles Stewart Parnell]] and his [[Irish Land League]] in 1880.

Sometimes, a boycott can be a form of [[consumer activism]], sometimes called [[moral purchasing]]. When a similar practice is legislated by a national government, it is known as a [[Economic sanctions|sanction]]. Frequently, however, the threat of boycotting a business is an empty threat, with no significant effect on sales.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Chang|first=Andrea|date=2021-05-09|title=Patagonia shows corporate activism is simpler than it looks|url=https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-05-09/patagonia-shows-corporate-activism-is-simpler-than-it-looks|url-status=live|access-date=2021-05-10|website=Los Angeles Times|language=en-US|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20210509123725/https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-05-09/patagonia-shows-corporate-activism-is-simpler-than-it-looks |archive-date=2021-05-09 }}</ref>

==Etymology==
[[Image:Charles Cunningham Boycott (Vanity Fair).jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[Vanity Fair (British magazine)|Vanity Fair]]'' caricature of Charles C. Boycott]]
[[File:Boycott KFC.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Protesters advocating boycott of [[KFC]] due to [[animal welfare]] concerns]]
The word ''boycott'' entered the English language during the [[Ireland|Irish]] "[[Land War]]" and derives from Captain [[Charles Boycott]], the land agent of an absentee landlord, [[John Crichton, 3rd Earl Erne|Lord Erne]], who lived in Lough Mask House, near [[Ballinrobe]] in [[County Mayo]], [[Ireland]], who was subject to social [[ostracism]] organized by the [[Irish Land League]] in 1880. As harvests had been poor that year, Lord Erne offered his tenants a ten percent reduction in their rents. In September of that year, protesting tenants demanded a twenty-five percent reduction, which Lord Erne refused. Boycott then attempted to evict eleven tenants from the land. [[Charles Stewart Parnell]], in a speech in [[Ennis]] prior to the events in Lough Mask, proposed that when dealing with tenants who take farms where another tenant was evicted, rather than resorting to violence, everyone in the locality should shun them. While Parnell's speech did not refer to land agents or landlords, the tactic was first applied to Boycott when the alarm was raised about the evictions. Despite the short-term economic hardship to those undertaking this action, Boycott soon found himself isolated – his workers stopped work in the fields and stables, as well as in his house. Local businessmen stopped trading with him, and the local postman refused to deliver mail.<ref>{{cite book|last=Marlow|first=Joyce|title=Captain Boycott and the Irish|year=1973|publisher=[[André Deutsch]]|isbn=978-0-233-96430-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wW4uAAAAMAAJ&q=Captain+Boycott|pages=133–142}}</ref>

The concerted action taken against him meant that Boycott was unable to hire anyone to [[harvest]] the crops in his charge. Eventually 50 [[Orange Institution|Orangemen]] from [[County Cavan|Cavan]] and [[County Monaghan|Monaghan]] volunteered{{clarification needed| Were they essentially functioning as strike breakers or (given the politization of the time and role of the Orange Order, were these specific individuals volunteering their services temporarily to keep the operation solvent and prevent the "Boycott" from achieving success.|date=February 2022}} to do the work. They were escorted to and from [[Claremorris]] by one thousand [[Royal Irish Constabulary|policemen]] and soldiers, despite the fact that the local Land League leaders had said that there would be no violence from them, and in fact no violence happened.<ref>{{cite book|last=Marlow|first=Joyce|title=Captain Boycott and the Irish|year=1973|publisher=[[André Deutsch]]|isbn=978-0-233-96430-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wW4uAAAAMAAJ&q=Captain+Boycott|pages=157–173}}</ref> This protection ended up costing far more than the harvest was worth. After the harvest, the "boycott" was successfully continued. Within weeks Boycott's name was everywhere. The ''[[New-York Tribune]]'' reporter, James Redpath, first wrote of the boycott in the international press. The Irish author, George Moore, reported: 'Like a comet the verb 'boycott' appeared.'<ref>Stanford, Jane, That Irishman: the Life and Times of John O'Connor Power, pp. 95–97.</ref> It was used by ''[[The Times]]'' in November 1880 as a term for organized isolation. According to an account in the book ''The Fall of Feudalism in Ireland'' by [[Michael Davitt]], the term was promoted by Fr. John O'Malley of County Mayo to "signify ostracism applied to a landlord or agent like Boycott". ''The Times'' first reported on November 20, 1880: "The people of New Pallas have resolved to 'boycott' them and refused to supply them with food or drink." The ''Daily News'' wrote on December 13, 1880: "Already the stoutest-hearted are yielding on every side to the dread of being 'Boycotted'." By January of the following year, the word was being used figuratively: "Dame Nature arose.... She 'Boycotted' London from Kew to Mile End" (The Spectator, January 22, 1881).

'''Girlcott''' is a [[portmanteau]] of girl and boycott intended to focus on the rights or actions of women. The term was coined in 1968 by American [[Track and Field|track]] star Lacey O'Neal during the [[1968 Summer Olympics]] in [[Mexico City]], in the context of [[1968 Olympics Black Power salute|protests]] by male [[African American]] athletes. Speaking for black women athletes, she advised that the group would not "girlcott" the [[Olympic Games]], because female athletes were still focused on being recognized. It also appeared in ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine in 1970.<ref>[http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,942367,00.html Cinema: Merely Graphic] - Stefan Kanfer, Time, 12 October 1970</ref> The term was later used by retired [[tennis]] player [[Billie Jean King]] in 1999 in reference to [[The Championships, Wimbledon|Wimbledon]], while discussing [[equal pay for equal work|equal pay]] for women players.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/29/sports/on-tennis-a-potential-girl-cott-imperils-grand-slams.html ON TENNIS; A Potential 'Girl-cott' Imperils Grand Slams] - Robin Finn, The New York Times, 29 April 1999</ref> The term "girlcott" was revived in 2005 by women in [[Allegheny County, Pennsylvania]] protesting what they said were sexist and degrading [[T-shirt#Decoration|T-shirt slogan]]s on [[Abercrombie & Fitch]] merchandise.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/bizarre&id=3590221 |title=Teen Girls Protest Abercrombie & Fitch Shirts |publisher=ABC Inc. |date=October 31, 2005 |access-date=March 18, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130120102515/http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news%2Fbizarre&id=3590221 |archive-date=January 20, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

==Notable boycotts==
{{Main|List of boycotts}}
[[File:Olympic boycotts 1976 1980 1984.PNG|thumb|The 1976 Montreal, 1980 Moscow, and 1984 Los Angeles Olympic boycotts]]
[[File:LiebenthalRechtsanwalt2.jpg|thumb|[[Nameplate]] of Dr. Werner Liebenthal, [[Notary]] & [[Advocate]]. The plate was hung outside his office on Martin Luther Str, [[Schöneberg]], [[Berlin]]. In 1933, following the [[Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service]] the plate was painted black by the Nazis, who boycotted Jewish owned offices.]]
Although the term itself was not coined until 1880, the practice dates back to at least the 1790s, when supporters of the [[Abolitionism in the United Kingdom|British abolitionists]] led and supported the [[free produce movement]].<ref>William Fox, ''An Address to the People of Great Britain, on the Utility of Refraining from the Use of West India Sugar and Rum''. 1791</ref> Other instances include:
* the Iranian [[Tobacco Protest|Tobacco Boycott]] in 1891
* [[Civil rights movement]] boycotts to protest [[Racial segregation in the United States|segregation]] (e.g., [[Montgomery bus boycott|Montgomery]] & [[Tallahassee bus boycott|Tallahassee Bus Boycotts]])
* the [[United Farm Workers of America|United Farm Workers]] union [[Delano grape strike|grape]] and [[Salad Bowl strike|lettuce]] boycotts
* the American boycott of British goods during the [[American Revolution]], such as the [[Boston Tea Party]]
* the 1905 Chinese boycott of American products to protest the extension of the [[Chinese Exclusion Act]] in 1902.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jonathan H. X. Lee|title=Chinese Americans: The History and Culture of a People|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pcLQCgAAQBAJ&pg=PR26|year=2015|publisher=ABC-CLIO|page=26|isbn=9781610695503}}</ref>
* the [[Swadeshi|Indian boycott of British goods]] organized by [[Mahatma Gandhi]]
* the successful Jewish boycott organised against [[Henry Ford]] in the United States, in the 1920s
* the [[boycott of Japanese products]] in China after the [[May Fourth Movement]]
* the antisemitic [[Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses|boycott of Jewish-owned businesses]] in [[Nazi Germany]] during the 1930s
* the [[Anti-Nazi boycott of 1933|Jewish anti-Nazi boycott]] of German goods in Lithuania, the US, Britain, Poland and [[Mandatory Palestine]] during 1933
* the [[Arab League boycott of Israel]] and companies trading with Israel.
* the worldwide [[Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions]] (BDS) campaign led by Palestinian civil society against the State of Israel.
*The global [[fossil fuel divestment]] movement, described by [[Desmond Tutu]] as an "apartheid-style boycott to save the planet",<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/10/divest-fossil-fuels-climate-change-keystone-xl|title=We need an apartheid-style boycott to save the planet|last=Tutu|first=Desmond|date=2014-04-10|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-06-05|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> and considered to be the biggest boycott-style campaign in history.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/08/fossil-fuel-divestment-a-brief-history|title=Fossil fuel divestment: a brief history|last=Vaughan|first=Adam|date=2014-10-08|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-06-05|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>

During the [[1973 oil crisis]], the [[Arab]] countries enacted a [[crude oil]] [[Oil embargo|embargo]] against the West. Other examples include the [[1980 Summer Olympics boycott|US-led boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow]], the [[1984 Summer Olympics boycott|Soviet-led boycott of the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles]], and the movement that advocated "[[disinvestment]]" in [[South Africa]] during the 1980s in opposition to that country's [[apartheid]] regime. The first Olympic boycott was in the [[1956 Summer Olympics]] with several countries boycotting the games for different reasons. Iran also has an informal Olympic boycott against participating against Israel, and Iranian athletes typically bow out or claim injuries when pitted against Israelis (see [[Arash Miresmaeili]]).

Academic boycotts have been organized against countries—for example, the mid- and late 20th-century [[academic boycotts of South Africa]] in protest of [[apartheid]] practices and the [[academic boycotts of Israel]] in the early 2000s.

==Application and uses==
[[File:BP Oil Flood Protest Boycott Wheres Cheney.JPG|thumb|Protesters advocating boycott of [[BP]] due to the [[Deepwater Horizon oil spill]]]]Boycotts are now much easier to successfully initiate due to the [[Internet]]. Examples include the [[homosexuality|gay and lesbian]] boycott of advertisers of the ''[[Dr. Laura]]'' [[talk show]], gun owners' similar boycott of advertisers of [[Rosie O'Donnell]]'s talk show and (later) magazine, and gun owners' boycott of [[Smith & Wesson]] following that company's March 2000 settlement with the [[Clinton administration]]. They may be initiated very easily using either websites (the ''Dr. Laura'' boycott), newsgroups (the Rosie O'Donnell boycotts), or even mailing lists. Internet-initiated boycotts "snowball" very quickly compared to other forms of organization.

''Viral Labeling'' is a new boycott method using the new digital technology proposed by the Multitude Project and applied for the first time against [[The Walt Disney Company|Walt Disney]] around Christmas time in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|title=Effective boycott campaigns – Multitude Project|work=Outreach|url=http://sites.google.com/site/multitude2008/Home/organize-efficient-boycott-campaigns|access-date=December 26, 2009}}</ref>[[File:Dontstopdontshop.JPG|thumb|right|African-Americans in Dallas boycotting a Korean owned [[Diamond Shamrock and Kwik Stop Boycott|Kwik Stop]] in a mostly black community.]]
Some boycotts center on particular businesses, such as recent{{when|date=October 2017}} protests regarding [[Costco]], [[Walmart]], [[Ford Motor Company]], or the diverse products of [[Altria Group#Food .26 Beverage|Philip Morris]]. Another form of boycott identifies a number of different companies involved in a particular issue, such as the Sudan Divestment campaign, the "Boycott Bush" campaign. The Boycott Bush website was set up by [[Ethical Consumer]] after U.S. President [[George W. Bush]] failed to ratify the [[Kyoto Protocol]] – the website identified Bush's corporate funders and the brands and products they produce.

As a response to consumer boycotts of large-scale and multinational businesses, some companies have marketed brands that do not bear the company's name on the packaging or in advertising. Activists such as Ethical Consumer produce information that reveals which companies own which brands and products so consumers can practice boycotts or moral purchasing more effectively. Another organization, [[Buycott.com]], provides an Internet-based smart-phone application that scans [[Universal Product Code]]s and displays corporate relationships to the user.<ref name=Forbes>{{cite web|last=O'Conner |first=Claire |title=New App Lets You Boycott Koch Brothers, Monsanto And More By Scanning Your Shopping Cart |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2013/05/14/new-app-lets-you-boycott-koch-brothers-monsanto-and-more-by-scanning-your-shopping-cart/ |work=Forbes |archive-url=https://archive.today/20140321130346/http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2013/05/14/new-app-lets-you-boycott-koch-brothers-monsanto-and-more-by-scanning-your-shopping-cart/ |archive-date=March 21, 2014 |date=May 14, 2013 |url-status=dead |access-date=September 3, 2016 |quote=Burner figured the average supermarket shopper had no idea that buying Brawny paper towels, Angel Soft toilet paper or Dixie cups meant contributing cash to Koch Industries through its subsidiary Georgia-Pacific. }}</ref>

"Boycotts" may be formally organized by governments as well. In reality, government "boycotts" are just a type of [[embargo]]. Notably, the first formal, nationwide act of the Nazi government against German Jews was a national [[Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses|embargo of Jewish businesses]] on April 1, 1933.<ref>{{cite web |title=U.S. Holocaust Museum and Memorial |work=Outreach |url=http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/boycott.htm |access-date=January 2, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061003092626/http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/boycott.htm |archive-date=October 3, 2006}}</ref>

Where the target of a boycott derives all or part of its revenues from other businesses, as a newspaper does, boycott organizers may address the target's commercial customers.

== Collective behavior ==
The sociology of [[collective behavior]] is concerned with causes and conditions pertaining to behavior carried out by a collective, as opposed to an individual (e.g., [[riot]]s, [[mass panic|panics]], [[fad|fads/crazes]], boycotts). Boycotts have been characterized by some as different from traditional forms of collective behavior in that they appear to be highly rational and dependent on existing norms and structures. Lewis Killian criticizes that characterization, pointing to the [[Tallahassee bus boycott]] as one example of a boycott that aligns with traditional collective behavior theory.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Killian|first=Lewis M.|date=1984-01-01|title=Organization, Rationality and Spontaneity in the Civil Rights Movement|jstor=2095529|journal=American Sociological Review|volume=49|issue=6|pages=770–783|doi=10.2307/2095529}}</ref>

Philip Balsiger points out that political consumption (e.g., boycotts) tends to follow dual-purpose action repertoires, or scripts, which are used publicly to pressure boycott targets and to educate and recruit consumers. Balsiger finds one example in Switzerland, documenting activities of the [[Clean Clothes Campaign]], a public [[Non-governmental organization|NGO]]-backed campaign, that highlighted and disseminated information about local companies' ethical practices.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Balsiger|first=Philip|date=2010-08-01|title=Making Political Consumers: The Tactical Action Repertoire of a Campaign for Clean Clothes|journal=Social Movement Studies|volume=9|issue=3|pages=311–329|doi=10.1080/14742837.2010.493672|s2cid=3335524|issn=1474-2837|url=http://doc.rero.ch/record/306807/files/Balsiger_Philip_-_Making_Political_Consumers_The_Tactital_Action_20180209.pdf}}</ref>

Dixon, Martin, and Nau analyzed 31 collective behavior campaigns against corporations that took place during the 1990s and 2000s. Protests considered successful included boycotts and were found to include a third party, either in the capacity of state intervention or of media coverage. State intervention may make boycotts more efficacious when corporation leaders fear the imposition of regulations. Media intervention may be a crucial contributor to a successful boycott because of its potential to damage the reputation of a corporation. Target corporations that were the most visible were found to be the most vulnerable to either market (protest causing economic loss) or mediated (caused by third-party) disruption. Third-party actors (i.e., the state or media) were more influential when a corporation had a high reputation—when third-party activity was low, highly reputable corporations did not make the desired concessions to boycotters; when third-party activity was high, highly reputable corporations satisfied the demands of boycotters. The boycott, a prima facie market-disruptive tactic, often precipitates mediated disruption. The researchers' analysis led them to conclude that when boycott targets are highly visible and directly interact with and depend on local consumers who can easily find substitutes, they are more likely to make concessions. Koku, Akhigbe, and Springer also emphasize the importance of boycotts' threat of reputational damage, finding that boycotts alone pose more of a threat to a corporation's reputation than to its finances directly.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Dixon|first1=Marc|last2=Martin|first2=Andrew W.|last3=Nau|first3=Michael|date=2016-04-12|title=Social Protest and Corporate Change: Brand Visibility, Third-Party Influence, and the Responsiveness of Corporations to Activist Campaigns *|journal=Mobilization: An International Quarterly|language=EN|volume=21|issue=1|pages=65–82|doi=10.17813/1086-671x-21-1-65}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Koku|first1=Paul Sergius|last2=Akhigbe|first2=Aigbe|last3=Springer|first3=Thomas M.|date=1997-09-01|title=The Financial Impact of Boycotts and Threats of Boycott|journal=Journal of Business Research|volume=40|issue=1|pages=15–20|doi=10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00279-2}}</ref>

Philippe Delacote points out that a problem contributing to a generally low probability of success for any boycott is the fact that the consumers with the most power to cause market disruption are the least likely to participate; the opposite is true for consumers with the least power. Another collective behavior problem is the difficulty, or impossibility, of direct coordination amongst a dispersed group of boycotters. Yuksel and Mryteza emphasize the collective behavior problem of free riding in consumer boycotts, noting that some individuals may perceive participating to be too great an immediate personal utility sacrifice. They also note that boycotting consumers took the collectivity into account when deciding to participate, that is, consideration of joining a boycott as goal-oriented collective activity increased one's likelihood of participating. A corporation-targeted protest repertoire including boycotts and education of consumers presents the highest likelihood for success.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Delacote|first=Philippe|date=2009-09-01|title=On the Sources of Consumer Boycotts Ineffectiveness|journal=The Journal of Environment & Development|language=en|volume=18|issue=3|pages=306–322|doi=10.1177/1070496509338849|issn=1070-4965|citeseerx=10.1.1.1030.5274|s2cid=154989034}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Yuksel|first1=Ulku|last2=Mryteza|first2=Victoria|date=2009-02-01|title=An evaluation of strategic responses to consumer boycotts|journal=Journal of Business Research|series=Anti-consumption|volume=62|issue=2|pages=248–259|doi=10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.032}}</ref>

==Legality==
[[File:HANDS OFF GAZA STOP THE BOMBING FREE PALESTINE - UK NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION.jpg|thumb|Protesters calling for a boycott of Israel]]

Boycotts are generally legal in developed countries. Occasionally, some restrictions may apply; for instance, in the United States, it may be unlawful for a union to engage in "[[secondary boycott]]s" (to request that its members boycott companies that supply items to an organization already under a boycott, in the United States);<ref>National Labor Relations Act, § 8(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(e).</ref><ref>''Local 917, Intern. Broth. of Teamsters v. N.L.R.B.'', 577 F.3d 70, 75 (C.A.2, 2009).</ref> however, the union is free to use its right to speak freely to inform its members of the fact that suppliers of a company are breaking a boycott; its members then may take whatever action they deem appropriate, in consideration of that fact.

===United Kingdom ===
When the boycott first emerged in Ireland, it presented a serious dilemma for Gladstone's government. The individual actions that constituted a boycott were recognized by legislators as essential to a free society. However, overall a boycott amounted to a harsh, extrajudicial punishment. The [[Prevention of Crime (Ireland) Act 1882]] made it illegal to use "intimidation" to instigate or enforce a boycott, but not to participate in one.{{sfn|Laird |2005|p=34}}

The conservative jurist [[James Fitzjames Stephen]] justified laws against boycotting by claiming that the practice amounted to "usurpation of the functions of government" and ought therefore to be dealt with as "the modern representatives of the old conception of high treason".{{sfn|Laird|2005|p=36}}

===United States===
[[File:“Boycott Xinjiang Genocide Products! Also don't attack our Chinese neighbors. Just say no to xenophobia and racism!” sticker on New York University campus in 2020 (cropped).jpg|thumb|“Boycott Xinjiang Genocide Products! Also don't attack our Chinese neighbors. Just say no to xenophobia and racism!” sticker on New York University campus in 2020]]
Boycotts are legal under common law. The right to engage in commerce, social intercourse, and friendship includes the implied right not to engage in commerce, social intercourse, and friendship. Since a boycott is voluntary and nonviolent, the law cannot stop it. Opponents of boycotts historically have the choice of suffering under it, yielding to its demands, or attempting to suppress it through extralegal means, such as force and coercion.

In the United States, the antiboycott provisions of the [[Export Administration Regulations]] (EAR) apply to all "U.S. persons", defined to include individuals and companies located in the United States and their foreign affiliates. The antiboycott provisions are intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government's foreign policy. The EAR forbids participation in or material support of boycotts initiated by foreign governments, for example, the [[Arab League]] boycott of [[Israel]]. These persons are subject to the law when their activities relate to the sale, purchase, or transfer of goods or services (including the sale of information) within the United States or between the United States and a foreign country. This covers exports and imports, financing, forwarding and shipping, and certain other transactions that may take place wholly offshore.<ref>{{cite web|title=U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security|work=Office of Antiboycott Compliance|url=http://www.bis.doc.gov/AntiboycottCompliance/oacrequirements.html#whatscovered|access-date=March 20, 2006 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060319092529/http://www.bis.doc.gov/AntiboycottCompliance/oacrequirements.html#whatscovered  |archive-date = March 19, 2006}}</ref>

However, the EAR only applies to {{em|foreign government initiated}} boycotts: a domestic boycott campaign arising within the United States that has the same object as the foreign-government-initiated boycott appears to be lawful, assuming that it is an independent effort not connected with the foreign government's boycott.

Other legal impediments to certain boycotts remain. One set are [[Refusal to deal]] laws, which prohibit concerted efforts to eliminate competition by refusal to buy from or to sell to a party.<ref>[http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/concerted-refusal-to-deal.html Business Dictionary]</ref> Similarly, boycotts may also run afoul of [[Anti-discrimination laws]]; for example, [[New Jersey]]'s Law Against Discrimination prohibits any place that offers goods, services and facilities to the general public, such as a restaurant, from denying or withholding any accommodation to (i.e., not to engage in commerce with) an individual because of that individual's race (etc.).<ref>[http://www.state.nj.us/lps/dcr/accom.html New Jersey State official website]</ref>

== Alternatives ==
{{Unreferenced section|date=January 2022}}
A boycott is typically a one-time affair intended to correct an outstanding single wrong. When extended for a long period of time, or as part of an overall program of awareness-raising or reforms to laws or regimes, a boycott is part of [[moral purchasing]], and some prefer those economic or political terms. Most organized consumer boycotts today are focused on long-term change of buying habits, and so fit into part of a larger political program, with many techniques that require a longer structural commitment, e.g. reform to [[commodity markets]], or government commitment to [[moral purchasing]], e.g. the longstanding boycott of [[South Africa]]n businesses to protest [[apartheid]] already alluded to. These stretch the meaning of a "boycott."

Another form of consumer boycotting is substitution for an equivalent product; for example, [[Mecca Cola]] and [[Qibla Cola]] have been marketed as substitutes for [[Coca-Cola]] among [[Muslim]] populations.

A prime target of boycotts is [[consumerism]] itself, e.g. "[[International Buy Nothing Day]]" celebrated globally on the Friday after [[Thanksgiving|Thanksgiving Day]] in the United States.

Another version of the boycott is targeted divestment, or [[disinvestment]]. Targeted divestment involves campaigning for withdrawal of investment, for example the Sudan Divestment campaign involves putting pressure on companies, often through shareholder activism, to withdraw investment that helps the Sudanese government perpetuate genocide in Darfur. Only if a company refuses to change its behavior in response to shareholder engagement does the targeted divestment model call for divestment from that company. Such targeted divestment implicitly excludes companies involved in agriculture, the production and distribution of consumer goods, or the provision of goods and services intended to relieve human suffering or to promote health, religious and spiritual activities, or education.

When students are dissatisfied with a political or academic issue, a common tactic for [[students' union]]s is to start a boycott of classes (called a [[student strike]] among faculty and students since it is meant to resemble [[strike action]] by [[organized labor]]) to put pressure on the governing body of the institution, such as a university, vocational college or a school, since such institutions cannot afford to have a cohort miss an entire year.

== Diplomatic boycott ==
A diplomatic boycott against an athletic event occurs when officials and diplomatic representatives do not participate.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hamilton |first1=Tom |title=What, exactly, is a 'diplomatic boycott' of the Beijing Olympics? |url=https://www.espn.com/olympics/story/_/id/32831100/what-exactly-diplomatic-boycott-beijing-olympics |website=espn.com |publisher=ESPN |access-date=30 January 2022}}</ref> It is intended to be largely symbolic with minimal disruption of the underlying competition. A number of nations participated in a diplomatic boycott of the [[2022 Winter Olympics]], citing [[Human rights in China|human rights violations in China]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kirby |first1=Jen |title=What the US’s diplomatic boycott of the 2022 Beijing Olympics does — and doesn’t — mean |url=https://www.vox.com/2021/12/10/22826798/beijing-olympics-2022-diplomatic-boycott-us-china-canada |website=vox.com |publisher=Vox |access-date=30 January 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Roan |first1=Dan |title=How much does the diplomatic boycott of Beijing 2022 matter? |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-59646231 |website=bbc.com |publisher=BBC |access-date=30 January 2022}}</ref>

== See also ==
{{Wiktionary}}
{{EB1911 poster|Boycott}}
* [[List of boycotts]]
* [[Anti-boycott]]
* [[Call-out culture]]
* [[Cancel culture]]
* [[Dollar voting]]
* [[Economic secession]]
* [[Election boycott]]
* [[Media bias]]
* [[Protest]]
* [[Export restriction]]
* [[Group boycott]]
* [[Moral purchasing]]
* [[No Platform]]
* [[Non-violent resistance]]
* [[Solidarity action]]

==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}

==References==
* Friedman, M. ''Consumer Boycotts: Effecting Change through the Marketplace and the Media.'' London: Routledge, 1999.
*{{cite book |last1=Laird |first1=Heather |title=Subversive Law in Ireland, 1879-1920: from Unwritten Law to Dáil Courts |date=2005 |publisher=Four Courts Press |location=Dublin |isbn=9781851828760 |url=https://cora.ucc.ie/bitstream/handle/10468/8165/HL_SubversivePV2005.pdf |language=en}}
* Hoffmann, S., Müller, S. Consumer Boycotts Due to Factory Relocation. ''Journal of Business Research,'' 2009, 62 (2), 239–247.
* Hoffmann, S. Anti-Consumption as a Means of Saving Jobs. ''European Journal of Marketing,'' 2011, 45 (11/12), 1702–1714.
* [[Lawrence B. Glickman|Glickman, Lawrence B.]] ''Buying Power: A History of Consumer Activism in America.'' University Of Chicago Press, 2009.
* Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., John, A. Why we Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation. ''Journal of Marketing,'' 2004, 68 (3), 92–109.

{{Media manipulation}}
{{Media culture}}

{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Boycotts| ]]
[[Category:Civil disobedience]]
[[Category:Community organizing]]
[[Category:Protest tactics]]
[[Category:Collective punishment]]
[[Category:Shunning]]
[[Category:1880s neologisms]]
[[Category:Ethical consumerism]]
[[Category:Consumer behaviour]]
[[Category:Interpersonal conflict]]

Boycott - Revision history

WikiDwarf at 16:44, 3 February 2022