Aspjack at 00:01, 6 February 2026

2026-02-06T00:01:55Z

New page

{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2025}}
The '''European and Anglo-Indian Defence Association''' was a pressure group formed in British India. The group's founder and president was the industrialist [[Keswick family#John Johnstone Jardine Keswick (1842–1904)|John Johnstone Jardine Keswick]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hirschmann|first=Edwin|url=https://archive.org/details/whitemutinyilber0000hirs|title="White Mutiny": The Ilbert Bill Crisis in India and Genesis of the Indian National Congress|date=1980|publisher=Heritage|isbn=978-0-8364-0639-9|pages=114|language=en|url-access=registration|via=The Internet Archive}}</ref> The Association has been described as "primarily, the political party of India’s non-official British".<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Renford|first1=Raymond K.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pf9tAAAAMAAJ|title=The Non-official British in India to 1920|last2=Renford|first2=Raymond K.|date=1987|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-561388-9|pages=239|language=en}}</ref> The Association was particularly well-known for opposing the [[Ilbert Bill]], and was criticised as a "Defiance" Association.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Majumdar|first=Bimanbehari|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.147654|title=Indian Political Associations And Reform Of Legislature(1818-1917) Ed. 1st|date=1959|pages=104}}</ref> Several tea and Indigo planters were members of the Association.<ref name=":0" />

The Ilbert Bill was formally introduced on 2 February 1883 in the [[Imperial Legislative Council]], during the Viceroyship of the [[George Robinson, 1st Marquess of Ripon|Marquess of Ripon]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roy|first=Somnath|title=Repercussions of the Ilbert Bill|date=1970|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44138511|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=32|pages=94–101|jstor=44138511|issn=2249-1937}}</ref> The Bill was drafted by [[Courtenay Ilbert|Sir Courtenay Peregine Ilbert]], a member of the Council of the [[Governor-General of India]]. The Bill allowed Indian Magistrates or Sessions Judges to try European subjects in British India. In response, the European and Anglo-Indian Defence Association held its first meeting on 29 March 1883, at the [[Kolkata Town Hall|Town Hall]] of Calcutta. The Association claimed to "watch over and protect the interests and promote the welfare of the following classes of persons in India": i) Europeans, ii) [[Anglo-Indian]]s, iii) European British subjects, iv) Americans, v) Armenians, vi) Eurasians, and vii) "other associated with Europeans by a community of sympathies and interests."<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mXUoAAAAYAAJ|title=The Calcutta Review|date=1883|volume=77|pages=184|language=en}}</ref> The Association divided its goals into political, benevolent and economic goals,<ref name=":1" /> thus going beyond thee ambit of the Ilbert Bill.<ref name=":1" /> Nevertheless, the Association claimed that its formation was necessitated "by the introduction into the Supreme Legislative Council, without reference to them, of a Bill to deprive them of one of their most cherished rights".<ref name=":1" /> At the meeting, Keswick articulated his opposition to the Bill as follows: "when natives have so far advancedthat the wives and sisters, daughters and mothers of those of the ranks from which our native civilians are drawn can come openly into Court and give evidence, and can mix with us and with our wives in society, then there will be so much of each other's innate nature known, that Government may seriously consider about giving natives the power they now ask."<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Reina|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a9BMB-d0T5MC|title=Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader|last2=Mills|first2=Sara|date=2003|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-94274-4|pages=438|language=en}}</ref> In the end, the Association's efforts succeeded in winning British and European subjects the right to trial by a jury of their own countrymen. Sir Hugh Rahere Panckridge, barrister-at-law and later judge of the Calcutta High Court observed some decades later: "No unofficial European has ever enjoyed the unquestioning confidence of his community to the same degree as "King" Keswick."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Panckridge|first=H. R.|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.38290|title=A Short History Of The Bengal Club|date=1927|pages=39}}</ref>

The Association continued to exist in the early 20th century, after Keswick's death. In 1908, British planters in India solicited the support of the Association to defend their interests.<ref>{{Cite book|last=|url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.233141/page/n172/mode/2up|title=The Planters Chronicle Vol-iii (1908)|date=1908|pages=172}}</ref> According to [[Henry Cotton (civil servant)|Sir Henry Cotton]], the Association was campaigning to defend British planters accused of physically assaulting Indian workers, leading to ill-feeling between races.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Cotton|first=Henry|url=http://archive.org/details/orindiai00cottnewindiarich|title=New India; or, India in transition|date=1904|publisher=London, K. Paul, Trench, Trübner, & co., ltd.|others=University of California Libraries|pages=48}}</ref> In 1909, the Association objected to the movement of Indian nationalists to boycott British goods.<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/dli.granth.33054|title=The Bombay Gazette, 16 September 1909|date=1909-09-16|publisher=The Bombay Gazette (Bombay)}}</ref> In 1912, the Association renamed itself to the European Association<ref>{{Cite book|last=|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.40008|title=Descriptive Guide Book To Calcutta And Its Environs|date=1928|pages=26}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last1=Renford|first1=Raymond K.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pf9tAAAAMAAJ|title=The Non-official British in India to 1920|last2=Renford|first2=Raymond K.|date=1987|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-561388-9|pages=335|language=en}}</ref> and went on to have prominent Englishmen among its members.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Burton|first1=Antoinette|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RVbL4dUpl7AC|title=Bodies in Contact: Rethinking Colonial Encounters in World History|last2=Ballantyne|first2=Tony|date=2005-01-31|publisher=Duke University Press|isbn=978-0-8223-8645-2|pages=191|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=East And West|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.70739|title=Asiatic Review New Series Vol.25 1929|date=1929|pages=271}}</ref> However, even after dropping the term "Anglo-Indian" from its name, the Association campaigned in favour of a fixed percentage of Anglo-Indian employees in the railways in India.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Chandra|first=Bipan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lzAiAAAAMAAJ|title=The Indian Left: Critical Appraisals|date=1983|publisher=Vikas|isbn=978-0-7069-2103-8|pages=111|language=en}}</ref> In 1931, the president of the Association addressed [[Chatham House]] and described the Association as "the only official body representing the political opinions of the non-official Europeans in India", and possessing "the official right of access to the Government of India and the Viceroy".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Villiers|first=E.|date=1931|title=The European Association and the Future Constitution of India|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3016060|journal=International Affairs |volume=10|issue=5|pages=652–665|doi=10.2307/3016060|jstor=3016060|issn=1473-8104|url-access=subscription}}</ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

[[Category:Political advocacy groups in India]]
[[Category:Colonial India]]
[[Category:Colonial Indian companies]]
[[Category:British Empire]]

European and Anglo-Indian Defence Association - Revision history

Aspjack at 00:01, 6 February 2026