Pranjal mishra at 21:01, 3 March 2026

2026-03-03T21:01:04Z

New page

{{About|the 1977 film|the 1961 play|Kanchana Sita (play)}}
{{Use British English|date=June 2011}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2020}}
{{Infobox film
| name = Kanchana Sita
| image = Kanchana Sita.jpg
| caption = A screenshot from the film
| director = [[G. Aravindan]]
| producer = [[K. Ravindran Nair]]
| screenplay = G. Aravindan
| based_on = {{based on|''[[Kanchana Sita (play)|Kanchana Sita]]''|[[C. N. Sreekantan Nair]]}}
| starring = Ramdas Venkateswarlu Chinna Pulliah Kesava Panicker Krishnan Pottiah Rangiah Siva Sobha Kiran Annapurna
| music = [[Rajeev Taranath]]<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/fr/2005/07/29/stories/2005072902600500.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051201203259/http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/fr/2005/07/29/stories/2005072902600500.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=1 December 2005|title=Eclecticism at its best |author=Garimella Subramaniam |location=India|date=29 July 2005|work=[[The Hindu]]|access-date=23 May 2011}}</ref>
| cinematography = [[Shaji N. Karun]]
| editing = Ramesan
| studio = General Pictures
| distributor =
| released = {{Film date|1978|12|21|df=y}}
| runtime = 87 minutes<ref>[http://www.keralafilm.com/8th.htm "8th IFFK: G. Aravindan Retrospective"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110929151658/http://www.keralafilm.com/8th.htm |date=29 September 2011 }}. [[Kerala State Chalachithra Academy]]. Retrieved 20 May 2011.</ref>
| country = India
| language = [[Malayalam language|Malayalam]]
| budget =
| gross =
}}
'''''Kanchana Sita''''' (''Golden Sita'') ([[Malayalam]] :കാഞ്ചന സീത) is a 1977 [[India]]n [[Malayalam language|Malayalam]] [[feature film|feature-length]] film scripted and directed by [[G. Aravindan]]. A mythological film, its story was adapted from [[C. N. Sreekantan Nair]]'s [[Kanchana Sita (play)|play of the same name]], which is a reworking of [[Valmiki]]'s ''[[Ramayana]]''.

The film interprets a story from the ''Uttara Kanda'' of the [[Indian epic poetry|epic poem]] ''Ramayana'', where [[Rama]] sends his wife, [[Sita]], to the jungle to satisfy his subjects. Sita is never actually seen in the film, but her virtual presence is compellingly evoked in the moods of the forest and the elements. The film retells the epic from a feminist perspective. It was shot in the interior tribal areas of [[Andhra Pradesh]]. The roles of the epic heroes are played by [[Chenchu|Rama Chenchu]] tribal people, who claim lineage to the mythological Rama. Director Aravindan interweaves the ''[[Samkhya]]''-''[[Yoga]]'' philosophical concepts of ''[[Prakriti]]''-''[[Purusha]]'' bonds throughout the film.

The film was produced by K. Ravindran Nair under the banner of General Pictures. The film features an original score by classical musician [[Rajeev Taranath]], cinematography by cinematographer-turned-director [[Shaji N. Karun]], editing by Ramesan, and art direction by [[Artist Namboothiri]]. The film became a major critical success upon its release in 1977, although a few mainstream critics panned it. It is credited with being at the forefront of a trend towards [[independent filmmaking]] in South India. The film earned Aravindan the [[National Film Award for Best Direction]].

==Plot==
The film begins with the journey of [[Rama]] and [[Lakshmana]] to kill [[Shambuka]] – the ''[[shudra]]'' who performs penance – but Shambuka's wife pleads for his life, and he is spared. Rama and Lakshmana return to [[Ayodhya (Ramayana)|Ayodhya]] to face [[Urmila (Ramayana)|Urmila]], the spirited wife of Lakshmana. Rama replies to her reproaches for abandoning [[Sita]] in the [[Dandakaranya]] forests, through which they have just journeyed, that the husband of Sita is only a servant of the people of Ayodhya.

The next day, [[Vasishta]] arrives to suggest that Rama perform the ''[[Ashvamedha]]'' ''[[yajna|yaga]]'' (the ritual sacrifice of a horse to ''[[Agni]]'', the god of fire) but Rama cannot do without his wife by his side. He is averse to taking a second wife, as Vasishta further suggests. The anguish of Rama at this point is juxtaposed with the people of Ayodhya joyously celebrating the harvest.

[[Bharata (Ramayana)|Bharata]], a brother of Rama who had left Ayodhya twelve years ago, returns. He objects to Rama performing the ''yaga'' without Sita. Their argument almost culminates in a physical fight, but nature intervenes; the skies open and a cooling rain pours down upon them.

The ''yaga'' begins, with Lakshmana accompanying the horse. The horse strays into [[Valmiki]]'s ''[[ashram]]'' (hermitage), where Rama's son [[Lava (Ramayana)|Lava]] and [[Kusha (Ramayana)|Kusha]] are being brought up. Lava stops the horse and is ready to fight Lakshmana (as the ''yaga'' demands). Lakshmana orders that the horse be released, but once again nature takes a hand. Valmiki is strangely moved by what he sees, and he begins to compose the ''Uttara Rama Charita'' – the story of Rama.

The horse is led back to Ayodhya, and the ritualistic second stage of the ''yaga'' starts. Just then Rama receives the news that Shambuka has resumed his penance, and Lakshmana is despatched to slay the erring ''shudra''. As the ceremony nears completion, Valmiki arrives with Lava and Kusha, but Vasishta debars Valmiki from entering the ''yagashala''. Rama recognises Lava and Kusha as his sons, and takes them to his heart. The joy of Sita, then, is represented in the glorious splendour of nature.

===Dénouement===
The film ends with an epilogue depicting Rama's last journey, the ''Mahaprasthana'', as he walks into the river with fire in his hand and becomes one with Sita, the all-pervading nature.<ref name="25 NFA"/> When asked whether Rama was really committing suicide, Aravindan replied, "Yes... in all probability. That is what I think. However, his death in Sarayu river is not like any other kind of death. It was a ''Mahaprasthanam'' – an event of supreme self-sacrifice and purification, leaving everything behind. Everyone dear to him had gone. He had parted from Lakshmana. He was troubled by many guilt feelings – the murder of Shambuka, the unfairness meted out to Sita... Towards the end of the film, this mood prevails – Rama walks into the Sarayu river with the sacrificial fire, bearing everything, including his loneliness, calling out for Sita ... and disappears into the depths of the waters, carrying the sacrificial fire with him into the river is not in ''[[Ramayana]]'' – it is an interpretation. Somehow the part I liked most in the film is this end."<ref name="Aravindan interview"/>

==Cast==
* Ramdas as [[Rama]]
* Venkateswarlu as [[Lakshmana]]
* Chinna Pulliah as [[Bharata (Ramayana)|Bharata]]
* Sobha Kiran as [[Urmila (Ramayana)|Urmila]]
* Kesava Panicker as [[Valmiki]]
* Krishnan as [[Vasishta]]
* Pottiah as [[Lava (Ramayana)|Lava]]
* Rangiah as [[Kusha (Ramayana)|Kusha]]
* Siva as [[Shambuka]]
* Annapurna as Shambuka's wife

==Themes and analysis==
The ''[[Samkhya]]''-''[[Yoga]]'' philosophical concepts of ''[[Prakriti]]''-''[[Purusha]]'' bonds are used in the film.<ref name="Prakriti 99">{{Harvnb|Zacharias|2008}}, p.99</ref> ''Prakriti'' and ''Purusha'', as philosophical concepts, have their genealogy in the ''Samkhya''-''Yoga'' school of [[Indian philosophy]]. In ''Samkhya'' thought, ''Purusha'' is the Transcendental Self or Pure Consciousness. It is absolute, independent, free, imperceptible, unknowable, above any experience, and beyond any words or explanation. It remains pure, nonattributive consciousness. ''Purusha'' is neither produced nor does it produce. Unlike ''[[Advaita Vedanta]]'' and like ''[[Purva-Mimamsa]]'', ''Samkhya'' philosophy emphasises the plurality of the ''Purushas''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Sharma|1997}}, pp.155–157</ref> ''Prakriti'' is the first cause of the universe – of everything except the ''Purusha'', which is uncaused, and accounts for whatever is physical, both matter and force.<ref>{{Harvnb|Sharma|1997}}, pp.149–168</ref> Through its threefold ''gunas'' or characteristics of the physical universe, ''Prakriti'' binds ''Purusha'', the self (in the minimal sense of awareness or sentience), which itself is not distinct from ''Prakriti''.<ref name="Prakriti 101">{{Harvnb|Zacharias|2008}}, p.100-101</ref> A written commentary that throws light on Aravindan's interpretation of the play precedes his film proper. The opening scroll reads, "This film is an interpretation of the ''Uttara Kanda'' of the ''Ramayana''. Our mythologies and the epics are constantly re-created in retellings. The epic is the basis for this visual interpretation as well. This film deviates from established norms in how it visualises the protagonists and portrays the course of events in the epic."<ref name="Prakriti 101"/> The scroll explains that the film will try to reflect what it calls the epic's ''adi-sankalpam'' (original conception) of the theme and the protagonists. It states that "the inner essence of the film is that woman is ''Prakriti''.<ref name="Prakriti 101"/> Ultimately ''Purusha'', here conceived of as the masculine self, dissolves into ''Prakriti''. [[Ezhuthachan]]'s ''Adhyathma Ramayana'', one of the first Malayalam poems, also views Rama as ''Purusha'' and Sita as ''Prakriti''.<ref name="Prakriti 101"/> Aravindan stated in an interview that "C. N. [Sreekantan Nair] had made clear the ''prakriti''-''purusha'' notion in ''Ramayana''". But Aravindan took the extraordinary cinematic step of representing Sita as Prakriti.<ref name="Aravindan interview2">{{cite web|url=http://www.cinemaofmalayalam.net/aravindan_df3.html|title=Interview: G. Aravindan on Kanchana Sita|publisher=Cinemaofmalayalam.net|access-date=20 May 2011}}</ref>

===Significance of the title===
The title alludes to the golden image of Sita that Rama sets by his side while he performs the ''Ashvamedha yaga''. The ''yaga'', a symbol of imperial power, requires that the king who performs it be accompanied by his wife. Since Rama had abandoned Sita twelve years earlier, the ''kulaguru'' (family preceptor), Vasishta, advises that he place a golden image of Sita at his side.<ref name="Panorama Kanchana Sita">{{Harvnb|Mathew|1977}} Rama Re-filmed, p.?</ref>

===Differences between the play and ''Ramayana''===
Malayalam playwright [[C. N. Sreekantan Nair]] wrote his magnum opus play ''[[Kanchana Sita (play)|Kanchana Sita]]'' in 1961. He took the inspiration for this play from the ''Uttara Kanda'' (''kāṇḍa'': chapter) of ''Ramayana''. ''Uttara Kanda'' is the seventh and last book of ''Ramayana''. It concerns the final years of Rama, Sita, and Rama's brothers,{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}} and is regarded to be a later addition to Valmiki's original story.{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}} The play is the first of Sreekantan Nair's dramatic trilogy based on the ''Ramayana''. The others are ''Saketham'' and ''Lankalakshmi''. A reworking of ''Ramayana'', the play is about the tragedy of power and the sacrifices demanded by adherence to [[dharma]], including abandoning a chaste wife.<ref name=Writing>{{cite web
| url = http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/21/stories/2005082101820200.htm
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070811132325/http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/21/stories/2005082101820200.htm
| url-status = dead
| archive-date = 11 August 2007
| title = Retelling the Ramayana
| access-date =23 May 2011
| author=K. Venkiteswaran
| date = 21 August 2005
| work = [[The Hindu]]
|location=India
}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Sreekantan Nair|Joseph|2005}}</ref>

''Kanchana Sita'' was developed by Aravindan, based on the play. The screenplay and dialogues of the film were written by Aravindan himself. The film is conceived differently from both Nair's play and the original ''Uttara Kanda'' of ''Ramayana''. If the ''Uttara Kanda'''s critique of sovereign power is buried in the ''karmic'' webs of Rama's life, Nair's play carries a sharply materialistic edge in its critique of ''[[Kshatriya]]''-''[[Brahmin]]ical'' power.<ref name="Prakriti 101"/> In contrast with both, Aravindan's thematic content is much more directly focused on Rama's inner conflict between ''moksha'' (the desire for enlightenment) and ''artha'' (the desire for sovereign power).<ref name="Prakriti 101"/> Sita does not appear in the film at all, but is depicted as ''prakriti'', or all-pervading nature, and the different moods of Sita are shown as different aspects of nature.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://girder.docuweb.ca/India/news/pr/synopsis.html|title=Kanchana Sita ( A feature film in Malayalam, with English sub-titles) Synopsis|publisher=High Commission of India|date=12 November 1997|access-date=20 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110817061818/http://girder.docuweb.ca/India/news/pr/synopsis.html|archive-date=17 August 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> Nair rewrote the final section of Valmiki's ''Ramayana'' as a critique of Brahminical privilege and political repression.<ref name="Prakriti 99"/> Using Nair's play only a starting point, Aravindan transformed the script according to his interpretation of Indian philosophy and his minimalist aesthetic. He replaced Nair's crisply-articulated exchanges of dialogue with a cinematic meditation on Rama's separation from, and eventual union with Sita, thus carrying the concept of Sita as ''Prakriti'' to its visual limit.<ref name="Prakriti 99"/>

===Dialogues===
The play's main feature is its very eloquent, long, and authoritative dialogues, whereas the film is almost silent. Aravindan explains: "There are some specific reasons for deciding to have sparse dialogues in ''Kanchana Sita''. One, this episode taken from ''Ramayana'' is familiar to all. Two, ''Ramayana'' is not a supernatural reality for us, as it is ingrained in us. It is therefore not necessary to educate people about the film through lengthy dialogues. C. N. [Sreekantan Nair] had made clear the ''prakriti''-''purusha'' notion in ''Ramayana''. I did not think that Sita should come in the film in the form of a woman. That is why Sita appeared in the film as ''prakriti'' and ''Prakriti'' is a character in the film. When the emotions of Sita like pain, sadness, joy, and equanimity are manifested through the moods of ''Prakriti'', dialogue becomes redundant. I felt I could make the film without dialogue. Rama committing suicide – (I still feel it was – self immolation) had haunted me very badly. With all these, my ''Kanchana Sita'' became very different. Words were required only for very essentials. The dialogues, which I used, were from C. N. [Sreekantan Nair]'s play. The doubt I had then was whether my Rama and Lakshmana (as they were ordinary people) could use such an eloquent Sanskritised language."<ref name="Aravindan interview"/><ref>{{Harvnb|Akademi|1998}}, p.38</ref> In another interview, he said, "Dialogues are there to carry on the storyline and make it move. But when it comes to well-known stories, dialogues ceases to be an essential ingredient." Dialogue was, however, included in ''Kanchana Sita'' at the end of the movie to discuss the responsibilities of the king.<ref>{{Harvnb|Dhawan|1992}}, p.61</ref>

===Characterisation===
The film significantly differs from all other adaptations of ''Ramayana'' in the characterisation of the central characters, including Rama and Lakshmana. The characters are humanised, contrary to the way divine characters from Indian mythology are usually depicted in visual media.<ref name="Aravindan remembered">{{Harvnb|Kutty|2005}} Aravindan remembered, p.35</ref> Rama has a pot belly, while Lakshmana has pockmarks on his face. In an interview, Aravindan stated, "Our sculptures are large in size and exude strength and vitality, which is absent in murals. The Rama of ''Kanchana Sita'' exudes the strength and vitality of our sculptures. He is not just a plain frontal image. The wandering tribals we encounter here and there with their medicines also share this quality. I enquired and found that these people are settled in villages near the Godavari River. Apart from this they also believe that they belong to the same race. That is why I cast two of them in my film."<ref name="Aravindan interview"/>

Similarly, Aravindan deliberately did not give a superhuman quality to Rama and Lakshmana. Only when they interact with Nature do they rise to the levels of God and go beyond the ordinary. In Aravindan's own words, "otherwise they would have been the same as anybody else." Diametrically opposed to this, Valmiki is given an appropriate form and beauty.<ref name="Aravindan interview"/>

==Production==
The film was produced by K. Ravindran Nair, who produced some of the most significant films that put Malayalam cinema on the world map. His productions also include memorable films of Aravindan, such as ''[[Thampu]]'' (1978), ''[[Kummatty]]'' (1979), ''[[Esthappan]]'' (1980), and ''[[Pokkuveyil]]'' (1981).<ref name="producer"/>

===Casting===
{{quote box|width=40%|align=right|bgcolor=lightblue|quote="Unfortunately a controversy arose because I had cast tribals. They have classical features and are marvellous actors. Yet I was accused of blasphemy."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/94ff8a4a35a9b8876525698d002642a9/c7693440bca3c3d7652572d000265e53/$FILE/A0190092.pdf|title=Aravindan, film-maker of poetic vision, dead|author=Khalid Mohamed|date=16 March 1991|access-date=20 July 2011|work=[[The Times of India]]|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725213426/http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/94ff8a4a35a9b8876525698d002642a9/c7693440bca3c3d7652572d000265e53/$FILE/A0190092.pdf|archive-date=25 July 2011}}</ref>|source= - ''[[G. Aravindan]]'s response to the controversies created due to the casting of tribals in the roles of the epic heroes.''}}
In ''Kanchana Sita'', the roles of the epic heroes like are played by ''[[Adivasi]]s'' (tribal members) from [[Andhra Pradesh]] known as the [[Chenchu|Rama Chenchus]] (also known as ''Koyas''), who claim that they are the descendants of the [[Ikshvaku clan]], to which Rama belonged.<ref name="Aravindan's art">{{Harvnb|Kumar|2010}}, p.?</ref> Aravindan's idea was not to use conventional actors, but to find people who had reached the state of awareness that the role required. Rama Chenchu healers play the central roles of Rama, Lakshmana, Bharata, Lava, and Kusha. Shambukha was played by a wayside ''tapasvi'', while a destitute woman acted in the role of his wife. The credited cast of the film includes Ramdas, Venkateswarlu, Chinna Pulliah, Kesava Panicker, Krishnan, Pottiah, Rangiah, Siva, Sobha Kiran, and Annapurna.<ref name="Panorama Filmography">{{Harvnb|Mathew|1977}} Filmography: Kanchana Sita, p.?</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Dharap|1978}}, p.90</ref> The name of each village chief is Ramdas. The tribal who acted as Rama is also a village chief.<ref name="Aravindan interview">{{Harvnb|Jayaram|1992}}, pp.26–28</ref> Valmiki's character was played by poet and dramatist [[Kavalam Narayana Panicker]]'s brother Kesava Panicker.<ref>{{cite news |title= കാവാലം നാരായണപ്പണിക്കരുടെ സഹോദരൻ |newspaper= [[Malayala Manorama]] |location= [[Kottayam|Kottayam, India]] |date= 12 May 2013 |page= 10 |language= ml |trans-title=Obituary: Kavalam Narayana Panicker's brother }}</ref> Director [[John Abraham (director)|John Abraham]] gave voice for this character.<ref name="Aravindan interview"/> When asked how he got the idea to use tribals for the film, Aravindan said, "These tribals come to [[Trivandrum]] to sell herbal medicine. They are extremely intelligent. In fact, the tribals inhabiting the nine villages around the Godavari river in Andhra are supposed to have the highest I.Q. among Indian tribals. The tribe I selected is known as the Rama Chenchus. They claim to belong to the dynasty of Rama. Physically, I feel, they fit the description given by Valmiki."<ref name="Thampu">{{cite web|url=http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/(docid)/79504FAA626DB2A265256940004D0E1C|title=A Film Maker Pitches His Tent|work=The Times of India|location=India|author=Kavita Nagpal|date=31 December 1978|access-date=21 May 2011}}{{Dead link|date=March 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> This experiment in casting resulted in several difficulties during production. A precise detailing had to be done because most of the actors could only react to demonstrated instructions.<ref name="Thampu"/> Communication with the actors was carried out with the help of Manmohan Dutt, painter and lecturer at the College of Fine Arts, [[Hyderabad, India|Hyderabad]]. Dutt also accompanied Aravindan and his associate, journalist and filmmaker [[Chintha Ravi]], on a preliminary trip to Andhra Pradesh to finalise the locations.<ref name="Prakriti 103">{{Harvnb|Zacharias|2008}}, p.103</ref>

===Filming===
The film was shot in colour in less than three weeks during November and December 1976, entirely in Andhra Pradesh, partly on the banks of the [[Godavari]], partly at Undavalli in [[Vijayawada]], and in the [[Vicarabad]] forest belt in [[Telangana]].<ref name="Panorama">{{cite journal|title=Rama Re-filmed|publisher=[[Directorate of Film Festivals]]|journal=Indian Cinema|editor=Rani Burra|author=Ammu Mathew}}</ref> Aravindan abandoned the typical alternation in setting of mythological films and dance dramas, including Sreekantan Nair's play, by moving Rama's story into the landscape ''Adivasis'', imagining Ayodhya in the forest. Its places are forest caves, its streets are tracks in the wilderness, and its [[Sarayu River (Ayodhya)|Sarayu river]] is the Godavari river winding through rural Andhra Pradesh.<ref name="Prakriti 102">{{Harvnb|Zacharias|2008}}, p.102</ref> Aravindan identified locations {{convert|160|km}} away from [[Rajahmundry]], along the expanse of Godavari river and its ribbed red earth banks.<ref name="Prakriti 102"/> Cinematographer-turned-director [[Shaji N. Karun]] wields the camera. Karun has been a recurring collaborator in Aravindan's films.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/fr/2006/03/24/stories/2006032402540500.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071030084821/http://www.hindu.com/fr/2006/03/24/stories/2006032402540500.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=30 October 2007|title=I need cinema to live|location=India|date=24 March 2006|work=[[The Hindu]]|access-date=20 May 2011}}</ref> He was assisted by popular cinematographer S. Kumar who was in his early days of career.<ref>{{Harvnb|Venu|2004}}, p.8</ref>

Filming took place at the time when [[The Emergency (India)|the Emergency]] was declared in India. Police were combing the entire area around Rajamundhry in their hunt for the Maoist [[People's War Group]]. Members of the production team were interrogated by the police several times because they looked different from the natives.<ref name="Prakriti 103"/>

The film was completed using simple devices such as table fans to rustle the leaves.<ref name="Aravindan interview"/> A few unexpected things happened for the good while shooting the climax scene. For instance, a rare and unexpected early morning mist on the banks of Godavari made the whole scene ethereal.<ref name="Aravindan interview"/>

==Reception==
The film received mixed reviews from critics,<ref name="ET">{{cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/culture-cauldron/silence-of-frames-re-visiting-thampu/articleshow/3743104.cms?curpg=2|title=Silence of Frames: Re-visiting Thampu|author=Vidyarthy Chatterjee|work=The Economic Times |location=India|date=22 November 2008|access-date=21 May 2011}}</ref> but is widely regarded as a landmark film in Indian cinema history. It is credited with the formation of a new trend towards [[independent filmmaking]] in South India.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.chaosmag.in/aravindan.html
| title = G. Aravindan's profile
| access-date = 11 April 2011
| publisher = India Film Database
| archive-date = 12 September 2011
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110912052135/http://www.chaosmag.in/aravindan.html
| url-status = dead
}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Britannica|2003}}, p.395</ref> ''[[The Hindu]]'' described ''Kanchana Sita'' as one of the most poetic films in Malayalam.<ref name="producer">{{cite web
| url = http://www.hindu.com/fr/2009/06/19/stories/2009061951190200.htm
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090623155746/http://www.hindu.com/fr/2009/06/19/stories/2009061951190200.htm
| url-status = dead
| archive-date = 23 June 2009
| title = The alchemist of cinema
| access-date =11 April 2011
| author=C. S. Venkiteswaran
| date = 19 June 2009
| work = [[The Hindu]]
|location=India
}}</ref> Scholar V. Rajakrishnan noted that Aravindan had not fully considered the implications of locating Rama's story in an ''Adivasi'' community. Rajakrishnan pointed out that the rigid economy of expression and the subdued acting styles, which appear to render all dialogue artificial, reduce the element of human drama that is so prominent in Sreekantan Nair's play.<ref name="Prakriti 104">{{Harvnb|Zacharias|2008}}, p.104</ref> Poet and scholar [[Ayyappa Panicker]] views Sita's absence as typical of Aravindan's style, in which there is a conscious, meticulous effort "not to communicate in order to communicate". Panicker described Aravindan's expressive style using his own concept of ''antarasannivesa'', or the poetics of interiorisation. "Sita is not a woman, or an individual, but an eternal concept in the film", Panicker said in an interview.<ref name="Prakriti 106">{{Harvnb|Zacharias|2008}}, p.106</ref> ''The Hindu'' critic Sashi Kumar stated, "In the film, Aravindan synthesises into a consummate whole his marginality principle and his anthropomorphic contemplation of nature."<ref name="Aravindan's art"/> Vidyarthy Chatterjee of ''[[The Economic Times]]'' said, "Visually stunning in many passages and using sound in such a manner as to make for heightened aesthetic pleasure, ''Kanchana Sita'' is a milestone that has unfortunately been bypassed by many who would have done better to focus on its innovative elements".<ref name="ET"/> Yves Thoraval said, "''Kanchana Sita'' is a visually dazzling film illustrating this long mythological episode potentially rich in dialogue but of which G. Aravindan has chosen to make a non-realist, virtually silent and contemplative film by calling up a tribal population to portray the mythological characters".<ref>{{Harvnb|Thoraval|2000}} Kanchana Sita: The Equation of Woman with Nature, p.402</ref>

The [[National Film Award for Best Direction]] was given to Aravindan for "the film's courageous and uncompromising exploration of an ancient epic theme through a pronouncedly new cinematic language, for making the camera speak more eloquently than the introspective characters of the ''Ramayana'', for projecting against the vast backdrop of nature, for matching profound philosophical ideas with astonishing evocations of the beauties of the physical world".<ref name="25 NFA">{{Harvnb|Directorate of Film Festivals|1977}} 25th National Film Awards, p.?</ref>

==References==
===Footnotes===
{{reflist}}

===Bibliography===
{{Refbegin}}
* {{cite book|title=Ramayana Stories in Modern South India: An Anthology |last=Zacharias |first=Usha |year=2008|editor=Paula Richman|chapter=Union with Nature: Prakriti and sovereignty in Aravindan's Kanchana Sita|pages=99–107|publisher=[[Indiana University Press]]|location=Bloomington |isbn=978-0-253-34988-0}}
* {{cite book|title=Aravindan and His Films|last=Jayaram|first=S. B.|year=1992|pages=1–36|publisher=Chalachitra |location=Trivandrum| oclc=33983644}}
* {{cite book|title = Retelling the Ramayana |first1=C. N. |last1=Sreekantan Nair |author-link1=C. N. Sreekantan Nair |author-link2=Sarah Joseph (author) |first2=Sarah |last2=Joseph |year=2005|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|location=New Delhi; Oxford|isbn=0-19-566623-2}}
* {{cite book|title = Bhashantaran Kala ek Parichaye|first=Madhu |last=Dhawan |year=1992|publisher=Vani Prakashan}}
* {{cite book|title = Malayalam Literary Survey |first=Kerala Sahitya |last=Akademi |author-link=Kerala Sahitya Akademi |year=1998|publisher=[[Kerala Sahitya Akademi]]|location=Thrissur|oclc=4602396}}
* {{cite book |last=Sundararajan |first=K.R. |title=Hindu Spirituality: Vedas through Vedanta|editor=Krishna Sivaraman, Bithika Mukerji|publisher=Crossroad Publishing |year=1989|pages=106–126|chapter=The Ideal of Perfect Life : The Ramayana|isbn=978-0-8245-0755-8|location=New York|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xPYp7_kMBK4C&pg=PA106}}
* {{cite book|last=Sharma|first=C.|year=1997|title=A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|location=Delhi|isbn=81-208-0365-5|pages=155–157}}
* {{cite book|last=Dharap|first=B. V.|year=1978|title=Indian Films|publisher=[[National Film Archive of India]]|oclc=1790604|page=90}}
* {{cite book |ref={{harvid|Britannica|2003}} |year=2003 |title=The New Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |location=Chicago |isbn=0-85229-961-3 |page=395}}
* {{cite book|last=Thoraval|first=Yves|year=2000|title=The Cinemas of India|publisher=Macmillan India|location=Delhi|isbn=0-333-93410-5|page=402}}
* {{cite book|publisher=[[Directorate of Film Festivals]]|title=Indian Cinema 1977–78|editor=Rani Burra|first=Ammu |last=Mathew |date=1977}}
* {{cite web |ref={{harvid|Directorate of Film Festivals|1977}} |url=http://iffi.nic.in/Dff2011/Frm25thNFAAward.aspx?PdfName=27NFA.pdf |title=25th National Film Awards |publisher=[[Directorate of Film Festivals]] |year=1977 |access-date=20 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721170417/http://iffi.nic.in/Dff2011/Frm25thNFAAward.aspx?PdfName=27NFA.pdf |archive-date=21 July 2011 |url-status=dead}}
* {{cite journal|url = https://frontline.thehindu.com/editors-pick/aravindans-art/article32943834.ece/ |title=Aravindan's art |first=Sashi |last=Kumar |date = 2–15 January 2010 |journal=[[Frontline (magazine)|Frontline]]}}
* {{cite journal|url=http://old.kerala.gov.in/keralacalmar_08/pg34-35.pdf|title=Aravindan remembered |first=K. V. Raman |last=Kutty |journal=Kerala Calling|date=March 2005|access-date=21 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110823161820/http://old.kerala.gov.in/keralacalmar_08/pg34-35.pdf|archive-date=23 August 2011|url-status=dead}}
* {{cite journal|last=Siddhinathananda|first=Swami |title=The Role of the Ramayana in Indian Cultural Lore|journal=[[Vedanta Kesari]]|url=http://www.eng.vedanta.ru/library/vedanta_kesari/ramayana.php}}
* {{cite journal|last=Venu|first=K. B. |date=2004 |title=The Palette of Nature|journal=Images|url=http://webperf.kodak.com/IN/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/publications/images/archived/apriljune04.pdf|access-date=3 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110902044316/http://webperf.kodak.com/IN/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/publications/images/archived/apriljune04.pdf|archive-date=2 September 2011|url-status=dead}}
{{Refend}}

==External links==
* {{IMDb title|0076254}}
* [https://www.malayalasangeetham.info/m.php?5276 ''Kanchana Sita''] at the Malayalam Movie Database

{{G. Aravindan}}

[[Category:1978 Malayalam-language films]]
[[Category:1978 Indian films]]
[[Category:Films directed by G. Aravindan]]
[[Category:Indian films based on plays]]
[[Category:Films whose director won the Best Director National Film Award]]
[[Category:Films based on the Ramayana]]
[[Category:Films shot in Andhra Pradesh]]

Kanchana Sita - Revision history

Pranjal mishra at 21:01, 3 March 2026