Adi Shankara

About: the vedic scholar Adi Shankara

For other uses, see Shankaracharya.

Adi Shankara (8th c. CE),Template:Refn also called Adi Shankaracharya (Template:Langx,Template:Refn Template:IPA),Template:Refn was an Indian Vedic scholar-monk, philosopher, and teacher (acharya) of Advaita Vedanta.Template:Sfn While in recent times he is often revered as the most important Indian philosopher,Template:Sfn reliable information on Shankara's actual life is scant,Template:Sfn and the historical influence of his works on Hindu intellectual thought has been questioned.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The historical Shankara was probably relatively unknownTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn and Vaishnava-orientedTemplate:Efn and his true impact lies in the popular perception of him as a heroic religious leader who re-established traditional Hinduism.Template:Efn

Until the 10th century Shankara was overshadowed by his older contemporary Maṇḍana Miśra,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn and there is no mention of him in concurrent Hindu, Buddhist or Jain sources until the 11th century.Template:Sfn The legendary Shankara was created in the 14th century, centuries after his death, when Sringeri matha (Sanskrit: Template:Lang)(maṭha) (monasteries) started to receive patronage from the emperors of the Vijayanagara EmpireTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn and shifted their allegiance from Advaitic Agamic Shaivism (Śaivism) to Brahmanical Advaita orthodoxy.Template:Sfn Hagiographies dating from the 14th-17th centuries deified him as a ruler-renunciate, travelling on a digvijaya (conquest of the four quarters)Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn across the Indian subcontinent to propagate his philosophy, defeating his opponents in theological debates.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn These hagiographies also portray him as founding four mathas. Adi Shankara also came to be regarded as the organiser of the Dashanami monastic order, and the unifier of the Shanmata tradition of worship. The title of Shankaracharya, used by heads of certain monasteries in India, is derived from his name. Tradition also portrays him as the one who reconciled the various sects (Vaishnavism, Shaivism, and Shaktism) with the introduction of the Panchayatna (Template:IAST) form of worship, the simultaneous worship of five deities – Ganesha, Surya, Vishnu, Shiva, and Devi, arguing that all deities were but different forms of the one Brahman, the invisible Supreme Being.

Owing to his later fame over 300 texts are attributed to him, including commentaries (Bhashya, Bhāṣya), introductory topical expositions (Prakaraṇa grantha) and poetry (Stotra).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn However, most of these are likely to have been written by admirers, or pretenders, or scholars with an eponymous name.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Works known to have been written by Shankara himself are the Brahmasutrabhasya,Template:Sfn his commentaries on ten principal Upanishads,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn his commentary on the Bhagavad Gita,Template:Sfn and the Updeshsahasri (Upadeśasāhasrī).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The authenticity of Shankara as the author of Vivekchudamani (Template:IAST) has been questioned and mostly rejected by scholarship.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

His authentic works present a harmonizing reading of the shastras, with liberating knowledge of the self at its core, synthesizing the inherited Advaita Vedanta teachings of his time.Template:Sfn The central concern of Shankara's writings was the liberating knowledge of the true identity of jivatman (jīvātman) (individual self) as Atman (Ātman-Brahman),Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn emphasizing that "right knowledge arises at the moment of hearing" the mahavakyas (mahāvākyas),Template:Sfn without the need of meditating on them. These mahavakyas are found in the Upanishads, which Shankara saw as the authoritative means of knowledge, beyond the ritually oriented Mimansa (Mīmāṃsā)-exegesis of the Vedas.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:RefnTemplate:Refn Shankara's Advaita showed influences from Mahayana Buddhism, despite Shankara's critiques;Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn and Hindu Vaishnava opponents have even accused Shankara of being a "crypto-Buddhist,"Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn a qualification which is rejected by the Advaita Vedanta tradition, highlighting their respective views on Atman, Anatman (Anātman) and Brahman.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Template:TOC limit

Dating

Several different dates have been proposed for Shankara.Template:Sfn While the Advaita tradition assigns him to the 5th century BCE, the scholarly-accepted dating places Shankara to be a scholar from the first half of the 8th century CE.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Matha datings

The prominent Advaita-mathas date Shankara to the 5th century BCE. This dating is based on records of the heads of the Shankara's cardinal institutions Template:IASTs. The exact dates of birth of Adi Shankaracharya believed by several monasteries are Kali 2593 (509 BCE) according to the Kanchipuram,Template:Refn 507 BCE according to Govardhan Math, 491 BCE according to Dvarka (Dvārakā),Template:Refn 485 BCE according to Jyotirmath, 484 BCE according to Jagannatha Puri, and 483 BCE according to Sringeri.

The records of the Sringeri Matha state that Shankara was born in the 14th year of the reign of "Vikramaditya", but it is unclear to which king this name refers. Though some researchers identify the name with Chandragupta II (4th century CE), modern scholarship accepts the Vikramaditya as being from the Chalukya dynasty of Badami, most likely Vikramaditya II (733–746 CE).

Scholarly datings

• 788–820 CE: This was proposed by late 19th and early twentieth century scholars, following K.P. Tiele,Template:Refn and was customarily accepted by scholars such as Max Müller, Macdonnel, Pathok, Deussen and Radhakrishna.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp Though the 788–820 CE dates are widespread in 20th-century publications, recent scholarship has questioned the 788–820 CE dates.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn
• Template:Circa CE: Late 20th-century and early 21st-century scholarship tends to place Shankara's life in the first half of the 8th century.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnpTemplate:Refn This estimate is based on the probable earliest and latest limits for his lifetime. His works contains traces of debates with Buddhist and Mimansa authors from the 5th-7th century, setting the earliest limit at Template:Circa. The latest limit is established by Vachaspati Mishra's commentary on Sankara's work, dated first half of the 9th century, thus setting the latest limit for Sankara at Template:Circa.Template:Sfnp

Other datings

• 44–12 BCE: the commentator Anandagiri believed he was born at Chidambaram in 44 BCE and died in 12 BCE.Template:Sfn
• 6th century CE: Telang placed him in this century. Sir R.G. Bhandarkar believed he was born in 680 CE.Template:Sfn
• 805–897 CE: Venkiteswara not only places Shankara later than most, but also had the opinion that it would not have been possible for him to have achieved all the works apportioned to him, and has him live ninety-two years.Template:Sfn

Traditional and historical views on Shankara

File:SankaraSthampaMandapam.jpg

Adi Sankara Keerthi Sthampa Mandapam, Kalady, Kochi

Traditional views of Shankara

Shankara has an unparalleled status in the tradition of Advaita Vedanta. Hagiographies from the 14th-17th centuries portray him as a victor who travelled all over India to help restore the study of the Vedas. According to Frank Whaling, some Hindus, particularly those who follow Advaita, view Shankara as someone who defended Hindu dharma in response to Buddhist and Jain challenges and contributed to the decline of Buddhism in India.Template:Efn His teachings and tradition are central to Smartism and have influenced Sant Mat lineages. Tradition portrays him as the one who reconciled the various sects (Vaishnavism, Shaivism, and Shaktism) with the introduction of the Panchayatna form of worship, the simultaneous worship of five deities – Ganesha, Surya, Vishnu, Shiva and Devi, arguing that all deities were but different forms of the one Brahman, the invisible Supreme Being, implying that Advaita Vedanta stood above all other traditions.Template:Sfn

Historical Shankara and (lack of) early influence (until 10th century)

Scholars have questioned Shankara's early influence in India.Template:Sfn The Buddhist scholar Richard E. King states, Template:Blockquote

According to numerous scholars, Shankara and other early Advaitins were probably Vaishnavites, or at least teaching in a Vaishnava-oriented milieu, and Shankara may have had a Pancharatra background.Template:SfnTemplate:Efn

According to Clark, "Shankara was relatively unknown during his life-time, and probably for several centuries after, as there is no mention of him in Buddhist or Jain sources for centuries; nor is he mentioned by other important philosophers of the ninth and tenth centuries."Template:Sfn According to King and Roodurmun, until the 10th century Shankara was overshadowed by his older contemporary Mandana-Mishra(Maṇḍana Miśra), the latter considered to be the major representative of Advaita.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Mandana-Mishra, an older contemporary of Shankara,Template:Sfn was a Mimansa scholar and a follower of Kumarila Bhatt, but also wrote a seminal text on Advaita that has survived into the modern era, the Brahma-siddhi.Template:Sfn The "theory of error" set forth in the Brahma-siddhi became the normative Advaita Vedanta theory of error,Template:Sfn and for a couple of centuries he was the most influential Vedanti (Vedāntin).Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn His student Vachaspati Mishra (Vachaspati Miśra), who is believed to have been an incarnation of Shankara to popularize the Advaita view,Template:Sfn wrote the Bhamati(Bhāmatī), a commentary on Shankara's Brahma Sutra Bhashya, and the Brahmatattva-samiksa, a commentary on Mandana Mishra's Brahma-siddhi. His thought was mainly inspired by Mandana Mishra, and harmonises Shankara's thought with that of Mandana Mishra.Template:Sfn The Bhamati school takes an ontological approach. It sees the jiva (jīva) as the source of avidya (avidyā). It sees yogic practice and contemplation as the main factor in the attainment of liberation, while the study of the Vedas and reflection are additional factors.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The later Advaita Vedanta tradition incorporated Maṇḍana Mishra into the Shankara-fold, by identifying him with Sureshvara Sureśvara (9th century), believing that Maṇḍana Mishra became a disciple of Shankara after a public debate which Shankara won.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

According to Satchidanandendra Sarasvati, "almost all the later Advaitis were influenced by Mandana Mishra and Bhaskara."Template:Sfn He argues that most post-Shankara Advaita Vedanta actually deviates from Shankara, and that only his student Sureshvara - who has had little influence represents Shankara correctly.Template:Sfn In this view, Shankara's influential student Padmapada misunderstood Shankara, while his views were maintained by the Sureshvara school.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Vaishnavite Vedanta (10th-14th century)

Hajime Nakamura states that prior to Shankara, views similar to his already existed, but did not occupy a dominant position within the Vedanta.Template:Sfn Until the 11th century, Vedanta itself was a peripheral school of thought;Template:Sfn Vedanta became a major influence when it was utilized by various sects of Hinduism to ground their doctrines.Template:Sfn The early Vedanta scholars were from the upper classes of society, well-educated in traditional culture. They formed a social elite, "sharply distinguished from the general practitioners and theologians of Hinduism."Template:Sfn Their teachings were "transmitted among a small number of selected intellectuals".Template:Sfn Works of the early Vedanta schools do not contain references to Vishnu or Shiva.Template:Sfn It was only after Shankara that "the theologians of the various sects of Hinduism utilized Vedanta philosophy to a greater or lesser degree to form the basis of their doctrines,"Template:Sfn whereby "its theoretical influence upon the whole of Indian society became final and definitive."Template:Sfn Examples are Ramanuja (11th c.), who aligned bhakti, "the major force in the religions of Hinduism," with philosophical thought, meanwhile rejecting Shankara's views, and the Nath-tradition.Template:Sfn

Vijayanagara Empire and Vidyaranya (14th century) - creation of legendary (hagiographic) views

In medieval times, Advaita Vedanta position as most influential Hindu darsana started to take shape, as Advaitins in the Vijayanagara Empire competed for patronage from the royal court, and tried to convert others to their sect.Template:Sfn It is only during this period that the historical fame and cultural influence of Shankara and Advaita Vedanta was established.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Many of Shankara's biographies were created and published in and after the 14th century, such as Vidyaranya's widely cited Śankara-vijaya. Vidyaranya, also known as Madhava, who was the 12th Jagadguru of the Śringeri Śarada Pītham from 1380 to 1386 and a minister in the Vijayanagara Empire, inspired the re-creation of the Hindu Vijayanagara Empire of South India. This may have been in response to the devastation caused by the Islamic Delhi Sultanate,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn but his efforts were also targeted at Sri Vaishnava groups, especially Visishtadvaita, which was dominant in territories conquered by the Vijayanagara Empire.Template:Sfn Furthermore, sects competed for patronage from the royal court, and tried to convert others to their own sectarian system.Template:Sfn Vidyaranya and his brothers, note Paul Hacker and other scholars,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn wrote extensive Advaitic commentaries on the Vedas and Dharma to make "the authoritative literature of the Aryan religion" more accessible.Template:Sfn Vidyaranya was an influential Advaitin, and he created legends to turn Shankara, whose elevated philosophy had no appeal to gain widespread popularity, into a "divine folk-hero who spread his teaching through his digvijaya ("universal conquest," see below) all over India like a victorious conqueror."Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In his doxography Sarvadarśanasaṅgraha ("Summary of all views") Vidyaranya presented Shankara's teachings as the summit of all darsanas, presenting the other darsanas as partial truths which converged in Shankara's teachings, which was regarded to be the most inclusive system.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The Vaishanava traditions of Dvaita and Visishtadvaita were not classified as Vedanta, and placed just above Buddhism and Jainism, reflecting the threat they posed for Vidyaranya's Advaita allegiance.Template:Sfn Bhedabheda wasn't mentioned at all, "literally written out of the history of Indian philosophy."Template:Sfn Such was the influence of the Sarvadarśanasaṅgraha, that early Indologists also regarded Advaita Vedanta as the most accurate interpretation of the Upanishads.Template:Sfn And Vidyaranya founded a matha, proclaiming that it was established by Shankara himself.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Vidyaranya enjoyed royal support, and his sponsorship and methodical efforts helped establish Shankara as a rallying symbol of values, spread historical and cultural influence of Shankara's Vedānta philosophies, and establish mathas to expand the cultural influence of Shankara and Advaita Vedānta.Template:Sfn

Hagiographies: Digvijaya - "The conquests of Shankara" (14th-17th century)

File:Kaladi shankarabirthplace.jpg

The birthplace of Adi Shankara at Kalady

File:Adi shankara.jpg

Murti of Shankara at his Samadhi Mandir, behind Kedarnath Temple, in Kedarnath, India

Reliable information on Shankara's actual life is scanty.Template:Sfn His existing biographies are not historical accurate documents, but politically motivated hagiographies which were all written several centuries after his time and abound in legends and improbable events,Template:Sfn creating the popular image of Shankara as "a religious leader who harmonized the major Hindu traditions, visited various temples, and composed hymns."Template:Sfn

Sources

There are at least fourteen different known hagiographies of Adi Shankara's life.Template:Sfn These, as well as other hagiographical works on Shankara, were written many centuries to a thousand years after Shankara's death,Template:Sfn in Sanskrit and non-Sanskrit languages, and the hagiographies are filled with legends and fiction, often mutually contradictory.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Many of these are called the Śankara Vijaya ('The conquests (digvijaya) of Shankara'), while some are called Guruvijaya, Sankarabhyudaya and Shankaracaryacarita. Of these, the Brhat-Sankara-Vijaya by Citsukha is the oldest hagiography but only available in excerpts, while Sankaradigvijaya by Mādhava (17th c.) and Sankaravijaya by Anandagiri are the most cited.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Other significant hagiographies are the Template:IAST (of Cidvilāsa, c. between the 15th and 17th centuries), and the Template:IAST (of the Kerala region, extant from c. the 17th century).

Scholars note that one of the most cited Shankara hagiographies, Anandagiri's, includes stories and legends about historically different people, but all bearing the same name of Sri Shankaracarya or also referred to as Shankara but likely meaning more ancient scholars with names such as Vidya-sankara, Sankara-misra and Sankara-nanda.Template:Sfn Some hagiographies are probably written by those who sought to create a historical basis for their rituals or theories.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Early life

According to the oldest hagiographies, Shankara was born in the southern Indian state of Kerala, in a village named KaladiTemplate:Sfn sometimes spelled as Kalati or Karati.Template:Refn His parents were an aged, childless, couple who led a devout life of service to the poor. They named their child Shankara, meaning "giver of prosperity". His father died while Shankara was very young.Template:Sfn Shankara's Template:IAST, the initiation into student-life, had to be delayed due to the death of his father, and was then performed by his mother.

Sannyasa

Shankara's hagiographies describe him as someone who was attracted to the life of Sannyasa (hermit) from early childhood. His mother disapproved. A story, found in every hagiography, describes Shankara at age eight going to a river with his mother, Sivataraka, to bathe, where he is caught by a crocodile.Template:Sfn Shankara calls out to his mother to give him permission to become a Sannyasin (a religious ascetic), or else the crocodile will kill him. The mother agrees and Shankara is freed, and leaves his home for education. He reaches a Saivite sanctuary along a river in a north-central state of India, and becomes the disciple of a teacher named Govinda Bhagavatpada.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The stories in various hagiographies diverge in details about the first meeting between Shankara and his Guru, where they met, as well as what happened later.Template:Sfn Several texts suggest Shankara's schooling with Govindapada happened along the river Narmada in Omkareshwar, but a few place it along the River Ganges in Kashi (Varanasi) as well as Badari (Badrinath in the Himalayas).Template:Sfn

The hagiographies vary in their description of where he went, who he met and debated and many other details of his life. Most mention Shankara studying the Vedas, Upanishads and Brahmasutra with Govindapada, and Shankara authoring several key works in his youth, while he was studying with his teacher.Template:Sfn It is with his teacher Govinda, that Shankara studied Gaudapadiya Karika, as Govinda was himself taught by Gaudapada.Template:Sfn Most also mention a meeting with scholars of the Mimansa school of Hinduism namely Kumarila and Prabhakara, as well as Mandana and various Buddhists, in Shastrartha (an Indian tradition of public philosophical debates attended by large number of people, sometimes with royalty).Template:Sfn

Travels (Digvijaya) and disciples

File:Adishankara.jpg

Thereafter, the hagiographies about Shankara vary significantly. Different and widely inconsistent accounts of his life include diverse journeys, pilgrimages, public debates, installation of yantras and lingas, as well as the founding of monastic centers in north, east, west, and south India.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

While the details and chronology vary, most hagiographies present Shankara as traveling widely within India, Gujarat to Bengal, and participating in public philosophical debates with different orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, as well as heterodox traditions such as Buddhists, Jains, Arhatas, Saugatas, and Charvakas.Template:Sfn The hagiographies credit him with starting several matha (monasteries), but this is uncertain.Template:Sfn Ten monastic orders in different parts of India are generally attributed to Shankara's travel-inspired Sannyasin schools, each with Advaita notions, of which four have continued in his tradition: Bharati (Sringeri), Sarasvati (Kanchi), Tirtha and Asramin (Dvaraka).Template:Sfn Other monasteries that record Shankara's visit include Giri, Puri, Vana, Aranya, Parvata and Sagara – all names traceable to the Ashrama system in Hinduism and Vedic literature.Template:Sfn

Shankara had a number of disciple scholars during his travels, including Padmapadacharya(also called Sanandana, associated with the text Atma-bodha), Sureśvaracharya, Totakacharya, Hastamalakacharya, Chitsukha, Prthividhara, Chidvilasayati, Bodhendra, Brahmendra, Sadananda and others, who authored their own literature on Shankara and Advaita Vedanta.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Death

According to hagiographies, associated with the four maths, Adi Shankara died at Kedarnath, a Hindu pilgrimage site in the Himalayas, located in the northern Indian state of Uttarakhand.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Texts say that he was last seen by his disciples behind the Kedarnath temple, walking into the Himalayas until he could no longer be traced. Some texts locate his death in alternate locations such as Kanchipuram in Tamil Nadu or in Kerala.Template:Sfn According to the hagiographies related to the monastery of Kanchi, Adi Shankara attains siddhi in Kanchi.Template:Sfn

Hagiographies: attribution of Mathas and Smarta tradition (14-17th century)

Template:See alsoTraditionally, Shankara is regarded as the founder of the Template:IAST of Hindu monasticism, and the Panchayatana puja and [[Shanmata|Template:IAST]] of the Smarta tradition.

Dashanami Sampradaya and mathas

Advaita Vedanta is, at least in the west, primarily known as a philosophical system. But it is also a tradition of renunciation. Philosophy and renunciation are closely related: Template:Blockquote

In the 14th century an elaborate legend was created, presenting Shankara as an incarnation of Shiva to facilitate the adoption of his teachings by previously Shaiva (Śaiva)-oriented Mathas (Template:IAST) in the Vijayanagara Empire.Template:Efn From the 14th century onwards, hagiographies began to present Shankara as an incarnation of Shiva, portraying him as establishing the Daśanāmi Sampradaya,Template:Sfn organizing a section of the Ekadandi monks under an umbrella grouping of ten names. Several other Hindu monastic and Ekadandi traditions, however, remained outside the organisation of the Dasanāmis.

According to tradition, Adi Sankara organised the Hindu monks of these ten sects or names under four mathas, with the headquarters at Dvārakā in the West, Jagannatha Puri in the East, Sringeri in the South and Badrikashrama in the North. Each matha was headed by one of his four main disciples, who each continues the Vedanta Sampradaya.

According to Paul Hacker, the system may have been initiated by Vidyaranya (14th c.), who may have founded a matha, proclaiming that it was established by Shankara himself, as part of his campaign to propagate Shankara's Advaita Vedanta.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Vidyaranya enjoyed royal support, and his sponsorship and methodical efforts helped establish Shankara as a rallying symbol of values, spread historical and cultural influence of Shankara's Vedānta philosophies, and establish monasteries (mathas) to expand the cultural influence of Shankara and Advaita Vedānta.Template:Sfn

Smarta Tradition

Traditionally, Shankara is regarded as the greatest teacherTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn and reformer of the Smartism sampradaya, which is one of four major sampradaya of Hinduism.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn According to Alf Hiltebeitel, Shankara established the nondualist interpretation of the Upanishads as the touchstone of a revived smarta tradition: Template:Blockquote

Panchayatana puja (IAST Template:IAST) is a system of puja (worship) in the Smarta tradition. It consists of the worship of five deities set in a quincunx pattern, the five deities being Shiva, Vishnu, Devi, Surya, and an Ishta Devata such as Kartikeya, or Ganesha or any personal god of devotee's preference. Sometimes the Ishta Devata is the sixth deity in the mandala. while in the Shanmata system, Skanda, also known as Kartikeya and Murugan, is added. Panchayatana puja is a practice that became popular in medieval India, and has been attributed to Adi Shankara. However, archaeological evidence suggests that this practice long predates the birth of Adi Shankara.Template:Refn

Neo-Vedanta (19-20th century)

Shankara's position was further established in the 19th and 20th-century, when neo-Vedantins and western Orientalists elevated Advaita Vedanta "as the connecting theological thread that united Hinduism into a single religious tradition,"Template:Sfn and became "an iconic representation of Hindu religion and culture," despite the fact that most Hindus do not adhere to Advaita Vedanta.Template:Sfn

21st century

A 108-foot statue of Adi Shankara was unveiled near Omkareshwar Temple in Madhya Pradesh to commemorate his life and work on 21 September 2023. Another 12-foot statue at Kedarnath was unveiled by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 5 November 2019, is made of chlorite schist and weighs 35 tonnes.

File:Shankaracharya Math Pashupatinath Temple Pashupati Kathmandu Nepal Rajesh Dhungana 6.jpg

Adi Shankaracharya Math in Pashupatinath Temple, Nepal

Works

Adi Shankara is highly esteemed in contemporary Advaita Vedanta, and over 300 texts are attributed to his name, including commentaries (Bhāṣya), original philosophical expositions (Prakaraṇa grantha) and poetry (Stotra).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn However, most of these are not authentic works of Shankara, and are likely to be written by his admirers, or scholars whose name was also Shankaracharya.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Piantelli has published a complete list of works attributed to Adi Sankara, along with issues of authenticity for most.

Authentic works

Shankara is most known for his systematic reviews and commentaries (bhashyas) on ancient Indian texts. Shankara's masterpiece of commentary is the Brahmasutrabhashya (literally, commentary on Brahma Sutras). The Brahma Sutras are a fundamental text of the Vedanta school of Hinduism.Template:Sfn Shankara refers to or cites some passages from works attributed to Gaudapada (the teacher of Shankara's teacher) in his commentaries, revealing a line of influence.

According to Flood, of the Upanishadic commentaries only his commentaries on the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad and the Taittiriya Upanishad are authentic.Template:Sfn Hacker and Mayeda also accept as authentic the commentaries on the Chandogya Upanishad, the Aitareya Upanishad, the Kena Upanishad,Template:Refn the Isha Upanishad, the Katha Upanishad, and the Prashna Upanishad.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The authenticity of the commentary on the Mandukya Upanishad and Gaudapadas Madukya-karika has been questioned.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Other authentic works of Shankara include commentaries on the Bhagavad Gita (part of his Prasthana Trayi Bhasya).Template:Sfn His Vivarana (tertiary notes) on the commentary by Vedavyasa on Yogasutras as well as those on Apastamba Dharma-sũtras (Adhyatama-patala-bhasya) are accepted by scholars as authentic works of Shankara.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Among the Stotra (poetic works), the Dakshinamurti Stotra, the Mohamudgara Stotra(Bhaja govindam), the Shivanandalahari, the Carpata-panjarika, the Visnu-satpadi, the Harimide, the Dasha-shloki, and the Krishna-staka are likely to be authentic.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Shankara also authored Upadesasahasri, his most important original philosophical work.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Of other original Prakaranas (प्रकरण, monographs, treatise), seventy-six works are attributed to Shankara. Modern era Indian scholars such as Belvalkar as well as Upadhyaya accept five and thirty-nine works respectively as authentic.Template:Sfn

File:Adi Sankara at SAT Temple.jpg

Murti of Shankara at the SAT Temple in Santa Cruz, California

Shankara's stotras considered authentic include those dedicated to Krishna (Vaishnavism) and one to Shiva (Shaivism) – often considered two different sects within Hinduism. Scholars suggest that these stotra are not sectarian, but essentially Advaitic and reach for a unified universal view of Vedanta.Template:Sfn

Shankara's commentary on the Brahma Sutras is the oldest surviving. However, in that commentary, he mentions older commentaries like those of Dravida, Bhartrprapancha and others which are either lost or yet to be found.

Works of doubtful authenticity or not authentic

Commentaries on Nrisimha-Purvatatapaniya and Shveshvatara Upanishads are attributed to Shankara, but their authenticity is highly doubtful.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Similarly, commentaries on several early and later Upanishads attributed to Shankara are rejected by scholars to be his works, and are likely works of later scholars; these include: Kaushitaki Upanishad, Maitri Upanishad, Kaivalya Upanishad, Paramahamsa Upanishad, Sakatayana Upanishad, Mandala Brahmana Upanishad, Maha Narayana Upanishad, Gopalatapaniya Upanishad. However, in Brahmasutra-Bhasya, Shankara cites some of these Upanishads as he develops his arguments, but the historical notes left by his companions and disciples, along with major differences in style and the content of the commentaries on later Upanishad have led scholars to conclude that the commentaries on later Upanishads were not Shankara's work.Template:Sfn

The authenticity of Shankara being the author of Template:IAST has been questioned,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn though it is "so closely interwoven into the spiritual heritage of Shankara that any analysis of his perspective which fails to consider [this work] would be incomplete."Template:SfnTemplate:Refn According to Grimes, "modern scholars tend to reject its authenticity as a work by Shankara," while "traditionalists tend to accept it."Template:Sfn Nevertheless, Grimes argues that "there is still a likelihood that Śaṅkara is the author of the Vivekacūḍāmaṇi,"Template:Sfn noting that "it differs in certain respects from his other works in that it addresses itself to a different audience and has a different emphasis and purpose."Template:Sfn

File:Vidyashankara Temple at Shringeri.jpg

Vidyashankara temple at Sringeri Sharada Peetham, Shringeri

The Aparokshanubhuti and Atma bodha are also attributed to Shankara, as his original philosophical treatises, but this is doubtful. Paul Hacker has also expressed some reservations that the compendium Sarva-darsana-siddhanta Sangraha was completely authored by Shankara, because of difference in style and thematic inconsistencies in parts. Similarly, Gayatri-bhasya is doubtful to be Shankara's work.Template:Sfn Other commentaries that are highly unlikely to be Shankara's work include those on Uttaragita, Siva-gita, Brahma-gita, Lalita-shasranama, Suta-samhita and Sandhya-bhasya. The commentary on the Tantric work Lalita-trisati-bhasya attributed to Shankara is also unauthentic.Template:Sfn

Shankara is widely credited with commentaries on other scriptural works, such as the Vishnu sahasranāma and the Sānatsujātiya, but both these are considered apocryphal by scholars who have expressed doubts.Template:Sfn Hastamalakiya-bhasya is also widely believed in India to be Shankara's work and it is included in Samata-edition of Shankara's works, but some scholars consider it to be the work of Shankara's student.Template:Sfn

Philosophy and practice

According to Koller, Shankara, and his contemporaries, made a significant contribution in understanding Buddhism and the ancient Vedic traditions, then transforming the extant ideas, particularly reforming the Vedanta tradition of Hinduism, making it India's most important "spiritual tradition" for more than a thousand years.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Benedict Ashley credits Adi Shankara for unifying two seemingly disparate philosophical doctrines in Hinduism, namely Atman and Brahman.

According to Nakamura, Shankara was not an original thinker, but systematised the works of preceding philosophers.Template:Sfn The central theme of Shankara's writings is the liberating knowledge of the identity of the Self (Ātman) and Brahman.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Moksha is attained in this life by recognizing the identity of Atman and Brahman,Template:Sfn as mediated by the Mahavakyas, especially Tat Tvam Asi, "That you are."

Historical context

File:*"Takht-i-Suleiman, Srinugger Srinagar," a photo by Samuel Bourne, 1860's* (BL) by tradition, this is the hill on which Shankaracharya meditated during his round of travels.jpg

Takht-i-Suleiman, Srinugger Srinagar," a photo by Samuel Bourne, 1860's* (BL) by tradition, this is the hill on which Shankaracharya meditated during his round of travels

Shankara lived in the time of the great "Late classical Hinduism",Template:Sfn which lasted from 650 till 1100 CE.Template:Sfn This era was one of political instability that followed the Gupta dynasty and King Harsha of the 7th century CE.Template:Sfn Power became decentralised in India. Several larger kingdoms emerged, with "countless vassal states".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn The kingdoms were ruled via a feudal system. Smaller kingdoms were dependent on the protection of the larger kingdoms. "The great king was remote, was exalted and deified",Template:Sfn as reflected in the Tantric Mandala, which could also depict the king as the centre of the mandala.Template:Sfn

The disintegration of central power also led to regionalisation of religiosity and religious rivalry.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Local cults and languages were enhanced, and the influence of "Brahmanic ritualistic Hinduism"Template:Sfn was diminished.Template:Sfn Rural and devotional movements arose, along with Shaivism, Vaisnavism, Bhakti and Tantra,Template:Sfn though "sectarian groupings were only at the beginning of their development".Template:Sfn Religious movements had to compete for recognition by the local lords,Template:Sfn and Buddhism, Jainism, Islam and various traditions within Hinduism were competing for members. Buddhism in particular had emerged as a powerful influence in India's spiritual traditions in the first 700 years of the 1st millennium CE,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn but lost its position after the 8th century, and began to disappear in India.Template:Sfn This was reflected in the change of puja-ceremonies at the courts in the 8th century, where Hindu gods replaced the Buddha as the "supreme, imperial deity".Template:Refn

Systematizer of Advaita

According to Nakamura, comparison of the known teachings of the early Vedantins and Shankara's thought shows that most of the characteristics of Shankara's thought "were advocated by someone before Śankara".Template:Sfn Shankara "was the person who synthesized the Advaita-vāda which had previously existed before him".Template:Sfn According to Nakamura, after the growing influence of Buddhism on Vedānta, culminating in the works of Gauḍapāda, Adi Shankara gave a Vedantic character to the Buddhistic elements in these works,Template:Sfn synthesising and rejuvenating the doctrine of Advaita.Template:Sfn

According to Koller, using ideas in ancient Indian texts, Shankara systematized the foundation for Advaita Vedānta in the 8th century, reforming Badarayana's Vedānta tradition.Template:Sfn According to Mayeda, Shankara represents a turning point in the development of Vedānta,Template:Sfn yet he also notices that it is only since Deussens's praise that Shankara "has usually been regarded as the greatest philosopher of India."Template:SfnTemplate:Efn Mayeda further notes that Shankara was primarily concerned with moksha, "and not with the establishment of a complete system of philosophy or theology,"Template:Sfn following Potter, who qualifies Shankara as a "speculative philosopher."Template:Sfn Lipner notes that Shankara's "main literary approach was commentarial and hence perforce disjointed rather than procedurally systematic [...] though a systematic philosophy can be derived from Samkara's thought."Template:Sfn

Shankara has been described as influenced by Shaivism and Shaktism, but his works and philosophy suggest greater overlap with Vaishnavism, influence of Yoga school of Hinduism, but most distinctly express his Advaitin convictions with a monistic view of spirituality,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn and his commentaries mark a turn from realism to idealism.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Moksha - liberating knowledge of Brahman

The central theme of Shankara's writings is the liberating knowledge of the true identity of jivatman (individual self) as Ātman-Brahman.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn One of Shankara's main concerns was establishing the Upanishads as an independent means of knowledge beyond the ritually oriented Mimansa exegesis of the vedas.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:RefnTemplate:Refn

According to Shankara, the one unchanging entity (Brahman) alone is real, while changing entities do not have absolute existence. Shankara's primary objective was to explain how moksha is attained in this life by recognizing the true identity of jivatman as Atman-Brahman,Template:Sfn as mediated by the Mahāvākyas, especially Tat Tvam Asi, "That you are." Correct knowledge of jivatman and Atman-Brahman is the attainment of Brahman, immortality,Template:Sfn and leads to moksha (liberation) from sufferingTemplate:Refn and samsara, the cycle of rebirth.Template:Sfn This is stated by Shankara as follows: Template:Blockquote

Pramanas - means of knowledge

Shankara recognized the means of knowledge,Template:SfnTemplate:Refn but his thematic focus was upon metaphysics and soteriology, and he took for granted the pramanas,Template:Sfn that is epistemology or "means to gain knowledge, reasoning methods that empower one to gain reliable knowledge".Template:Citation needed According to Sengaku Mayeda, "in no place in his works [...] does he give any systematic account of them,"Template:Sfn taking Atman-Brahman to be self-evident (svapramanaka) and self-established (svatahsiddha), and "an investigation of the means of knowledge is of no use for the attainment of final release."Template:Sfn Mayeda notes that Shankara's arguments are "strikingly realistic and not idealistic," arguing that jnana is based on existing things (vastutantra), and "not upon Vedic injunction (codanatantra) nor upon man (purusatantra).Template:Sfn

According to Michael Comans (aka Vasudevacharya), Shankara considered perception and inference as a primary most reliable epistemic means, and where these means to knowledge help one gain "what is beneficial and to avoid what is harmful", there is no need for or wisdom in referring to the scriptures.Template:Sfn In certain matters related to metaphysics and ethics, says Shankara, the testimony and wisdom in scriptures such as the Vedas and the Upanishads become important.Template:Sfn

Merrell-Wolff states that Shankara accepts Vedas and Upanishads as a source of knowledge as he develops his philosophical theses, yet he never rests his case on the ancient texts, rather proves each thesis, point by point using the pramanas (means of knowledge) of reason and experience. Hacker and Phillips note that his insight into rules of reasoning and hierarchical emphasis on epistemic steps is "doubtlessly the suggestion" of Shankara in Brahma-sutra-bhasya, an insight that flowers in the works of his companion and disciple Padmapada.

Logic versus revelation

Stcherbatsky in 1927 criticized Shankara for demanding the use of logic from Madhyamika Buddhists, while himself resorting to revelation as a source of knowledge.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Sircar in 1933 offered a different perspective and stated, "Sankara recognizes the value of the law of contrariety and self-alienation from the standpoint of idealistic logic; and it has consequently been possible for him to integrate appearance with reality."

Recent scholarship states that Shankara's arguments on revelation are about apta vacana (Sanskrit: आप्तवचन, sayings of the wise, relying on word, testimony of past or present reliable experts). It is part of his and Advaita Vedanta's epistemological foundation. The Advaita Vedanta tradition considers such testimony epistemically valid, asserting that a human being needs to know numerous facts, and with the limited time and energy available, he can learn only a fraction of those facts and truths directly. Shankara considered the teachings in the Vedas and Upanishads as apta vacana and a valid source of knowledge. He suggests the importance of teacher-disciple relationship on combining logic and revelation to attain moksha in his text Upadeshasahasri.Template:Sfn Anantanand Rambachan and others state that Shankara did not rely exclusively on Vedic statements, but also used a range of logical methods and reasoning methodology and other pramanas.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Anubhava

Anantanand Rambachan summarizes the widely held view on the role of anubhava in Shankara's epistemology as follows, before critiquing it: Template:Blockquote

Yoga and contemplative exercises

Shankara considered the purity and steadiness of mind achieved in Yoga as an aid to gaining moksha knowledge, but such yogic state of mind cannot in itself give rise to such knowledge. To Shankara, that knowledge of Brahman springs only from inquiry into the teachings of the Upanishads. The method of yoga, encouraged in Shankara's teachings notes Comans, includes withdrawal of mind from sense objects as in Patanjali's system, but it is not complete thought suppression, instead it is a "meditative exercise of withdrawal from the particular and identification with the universal, leading to contemplation of oneself as the most universal, namely, Consciousness". Describing Shankara's style of yogic practice, Comans writes:

the type of yoga which Sankara presents here is a method of merging, as it were, the particular (visesa) into the general (samanya). For example, diverse sounds are merged in the sense of hearing, which has greater generality insofar as the sense of hearing is the locus of all sounds. The sense of hearing is merged into the mind, whose nature consists of thinking about things, and the mind is in turn merged into the intellect, which Sankara then says is made into 'mere cognition' (vijnanamatra); that is, all particular cognitions resolve into their universal, which is cognition as such, thought without any particular object. And that in turn is merged into its universal, mere Consciousness (prajnafnaghana), upon which everything previously referred to ultimately depends.

Shankara rejected those yoga system variations that suggest complete thought suppression leads to liberation, as well the view that the Shrutis teach liberation as something apart from the knowledge of the oneness of the Self. Knowledge alone and insights relating to true nature of things, taught Shankara, is what liberates. He placed great emphasis on the study of the Upanisads, emphasizing them as necessary and sufficient means to gain Self-liberating knowledge. Sankara also emphasized the need for and the role of Guru (Acharya, teacher) for such knowledge.

Samanvayat Tatparya Linga

Shankara cautioned against cherrypicking a phrase or verse out of context from Vedic literature, and remarks in the opening chapter of his Brahmasutra-Bhasya that the Anvaya (theme or purport) of any treatise can only be correctly understood if one attends to the Samanvayat Tatparya Linga, that is six characteristics of the text under consideration: (1) the common in Upakrama (introductory statement) and Upasamhara (conclusions); (2) Abhyasa (message repeated); (3) Apurvata (unique proposition or novelty); (4) Phala (fruit or result derived); (5) Arthavada (explained meaning, praised point) and (6) Yukti (verifiable reasoning).Template:Sfn While this methodology has roots in the theoretical works of Nyaya school of Hinduism, Shankara consolidated and applied it with his unique exegetical method called Anvaya-Vyatireka, which states that for proper understanding one must "accept only meanings that are compatible with all characteristics" and "exclude meanings that are incompatible with any".

The Mahāvākyas - true identity as Ātman-Brahman

Moksha, liberation from suffering and rebirth and attaining immortality, is attained by disidentification from the body-mind complex and gaining self-knowledge as being in essence Atman-Brahman.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn According to Shankara, the individual jivĀtman and Brahman seem different at the empirical level of reality, but this difference is only an illusion, and at the highest level of reality they are really identical.Template:Sfn The real self is Sat, "the Existent," that is, Ātman-Brahman.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Whereas the difference between Ātman and non-Ātman is deemed self-evident, knowledge of the true identity of jivĀtman as Brahman is revealed by the shruti, especially the Upanishadic statement tat tvam asi.

Mahāvākyas

According to Shankara, a large number of Upanishadic statements reveal the true identity of jivĀtman as Brahman. In the Advaita Vedānta tradition, four of those statements, the Mahāvākyas, which are taken literal, in contrast to other statements, have a special importance in revealing this identity.Template:Sfn They are:

• तत्त्वमसि, tat tvam asi, Chandogya VI.8.7. Traditionally rendered as "That Thou Art" (that you are),Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn with tat in Ch.U.6.8.7 referring to sat, "the Existent"Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn); correctly translated as "That's how [thus] you are,"Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn with tat in Ch.U.6.12.3, it' original location from where it was copied to other verses,Template:Sfn referring to "the very nature of all existence as permeated by [the finest essence]"Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn
• अहं ब्रह्मास्मि, aham brahmāsmi, Brhadāranyaka I.4.10, "I am Brahman," or "I am Divine."Template:Sfn
• प्रज्ञानं ब्रह्म, prajñānam brahma, Aitareya V.3, "PrajñānamTemplate:Refn is Brahman."Template:Refn
• अयमात्मा ब्रह्म, ayamātmā brahma, Mandukya II, "This Atman is Brahman."

That you are

The longest chapter of Shankara's Upadesasahasri, chapter 18, "That Art Thou," is devoted to considerations on the insight "I am ever-free, the existent" (sat), and the identity expressed in Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7 in the mahavakya (great sentence) "tat tvam asi", "that thou art."Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In this statement, according to Shankara, tat refers to Sat,Template:Sfn "the Existent"Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Existence, Being, or Brahman,Template:Sfn the Real, the "Root of the world,"Template:SfnTemplate:Refn the true essence or root or origin of everything that exists.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn "Tvam" refers to one's real I, pratyagatman or inner Self,Template:Sfn the "direct Witness within everything,"Template:Sfn "free from caste, family, and purifying ceremonies,"Template:Sfn the essence, Atman, which the individual at the core is. As Shankara states in the Upadesasahasri: Template:Blockquote

The statement "tat tvam asi" sheds the false notion that Atman is different from Brahman.Template:Sfn According to Nakamura, the non-duality of atman and Brahman "is a famous characteristic of Sankara's thought, but it was already taught by Sundarapandya"Template:Sfn (Template:Circa or earlier).Template:Sfn Shankara cites Sundarapandya in his comments to Brahma Sutra verse I.1.4: Template:Blockquote

From this, and a large number of other accordances, Nakamura concludes that Shankar was not an original thinker, but "a synthesizer of existing Advaita and the rejuvenator, as well as a defender, of ancient learning."Template:Sfn

Meditation on the Mahāvākya

In the Upadesasahasri Shankara, Shankara is ambivalent on the need for meditation on the Upanishadic mahavyaka. He states that "right knowledge arises at the moment of hearing,"Template:Sfn and rejects prasamcaksa or prasamkhyana meditation, that is, meditation on the meaning of the sentences, and in Up.II.3 recommends parisamkhyana,Template:Sfn separating Atman from everything that is not Atman, that is, the sense-objects and sense-organs, and the pleasant and unpleasant things and merit and demerit connected with them.Template:Sfn Yet, Shankara then concludes with declaring that only Atman exists, stating that "all the sentences of the Upanishads concerning non-duality of Atman should be fully contemplated, should be contemplated."Template:Sfn As Mayeda states, "how they [prasamcaksa or prasamkhyana versus parisamkhyana] differ from each other is not known."Template:Sfn

Prasamkhyana was advocated by Mandana Misra,Template:Sfn the older contemporary of Shankara who was the most influential Advaitin until the 10th century.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn "According to Mandana, the mahavakyas are incapable, by themselves, of bringing about brahmajnana. The Vedanta-vakyas convey an indirect knowledge which is made direct only by deep meditation (prasamkhyana). The latter is a continuous contemplation of the purport of the mahavakyas.Template:Sfn Vācaspati Miśra, a student of Mandana Misra, agreed with Mandana Misra, and their stance is defended by the Bhamati-school, founded by Vācaspati Miśra.Template:Sfn In contrast, the Vivarana school founded by Prakasatman (Template:Circa–1300)Template:Sfn follows Shankara closely, arguing that the mahavakyas are the direct cause of gaining knowledge.Template:Sfn

Renouncement of ritualism

Shankara, in his text Upadesasahasri, discourages ritual worship such as oblations to Deva (God), because that assumes the Self within is different from the Brahman.Template:RefnTemplate:Refn The "doctrine of difference" is wrong, asserts Shankara, because, "he who knows the Brahman is one and he is another, does not know Brahman".Template:Sfn The false notion that Atman is different from BrahmanTemplate:Sfn is connected with the novice's conviction that (Upadeshasahasri II.1.25) Template:Blockquote

Recognizing oneself as "the Existent-Brahman," which is mediated by scriptural teachings, is contrasted with the notion of "I act," which is mediated by relying on sense-perception and the like.Template:Sfn According to Shankara, the statement "Thou art That" "remove[s] the delusion of a hearer,"Template:Sfn "so through sentences as "Thou art That" one knows one's own Atman, the witness of all internal organs,"Template:Sfn and not from any actions.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn With this realization, the performance of rituals is prohibited, "since [the use of] rituals and their requisites is contradictory to the realization of the identity [of Atman] with the highest Atman."Template:Sfn

However, Shankara also asserts that Self-knowledge is realized when one's mind is purified by an ethical life that observes Yamas such as Ahimsa (non-injury, non-violence to others in body, mind and thoughts) and Niyamas. Rituals and rites such as yajna (a fire ritual), asserts Shankara, can help draw and prepare the mind for the journey to Self-knowledge.Template:Sfn He emphasizes the need for ethics such as Akrodha and Yamas during Brahmacharya, stating the lack of ethics as causes that prevent students from attaining knowledge.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Īśvara

Shankara, while rejecting empirical reality due to his position of nonduality, still attributes value to the universe as it identifies with Īśvara. He sometimes blurs the distinction between Īśvara and Brahman, using various terms for both. However, he generally separates Īśvara, associated with the universe and its attributes, from the absolute nondual Brahman. Drawing from the Upanishads, Shankara sees Īśvara as the universe's material and intelligent cause, emanating it through the power of maya, thereby making the universe sentient and self-aware. In relation to the Mandukya Upanishad, Shankara compares the universe's unmanifest state to Īśvara in a deep dreamless cosmic state.

Shankara's conception of Brahman as the cause of the world does not invoke creation in the literal sense but vivartta (manifoldness without transformation), distinct from satkaryavada (actual transformation). Shankara argues that insentient matter cannot act purposefully and rejects any actual transformation of Brahman.

Influences of Mahayana Buddhism

Shankara's Vedanta shows similarities with Mahayana Buddhism; opponents have even accused Shankara of being a "crypto-Buddhist,"Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn a qualification which is rejected by the Advaita Vedanta tradition, given the differences between these two schools. According to Shankara, a major difference between Advaita and Mahayana Buddhism are their views on Atman and Brahman.Template:Sfn According to both Loy and Jayatilleke, more differences can be discerned. Suthren Hirst and others have also noted that Shankara's advaita may stem from a Vaishnavite advaita tradition.Template:Sfn

Similarities and influences

Despite Shankara's criticism of certain schools of Mahayana Buddhism, Shankara's philosophy shows strong similarities with the Mahayana Buddhist philosophy which he attacks.Template:Sfn According to S.N. Dasgupta, Template:Blockquote

According to Mudgal, Shankara's Advaita and the Buddhist Madhyamaka view of ultimate reality are compatible because they are both transcendental, indescribable, non-dual and only arrived at through a via negativa (neti neti). Mudgal concludes therefore that Template:Blockquote

Some Hindu scholars criticized Advaita for its Maya and non-theistic doctrinal similarities with Buddhism.Template:Sfn Ramanuja, the founder of Vishishtadvaita Vedānta, accused Adi Shankara of being a Prachanna Bauddha, that is, a "crypto-Buddhist",Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn and someone who was undermining theistic Bhakti devotionalism.Template:Sfn The non-Advaita scholar Bhaskara of the Bhedabheda Vedānta tradition, similarly around 800 CE, accused Shankara's Advaita as "this despicable broken down Mayavada that has been chanted by the Mahayana Buddhists", and a school that is undermining the ritual duties set in Vedic orthodoxy.Template:Sfn

Differences

The qualification of "crypto-Buddhist" is rejected by the Advaita Vedanta tradition, highlighting their respective views on Atman, Anatta and Brahman.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn There are differences in the conceptual means of "liberation." Nirvana, a term more often used in Buddhism, is the liberating 'blowing out' of craving, aided by the realization and acceptance that there is no Self (anatman) as the center of perception, craving, and delusion. Moksha, a term more common in Hinduism, is the similar liberating release from craving and ignorance, yet aided by the realization and acceptance that one's inner Self is not a personal 'ego-self', but a Universal Self.

Films

• Shankaracharya (1927), Indian silent film about Shankara by Kali Prasad Ghosh.
• Jagadguru Shrimad Shankaracharya (1928), Indian silent film by Parshwanath Yeshwant Altekar.
• Jagadguru Shankaracharya (1955), Indian Hindi film by Sheikh Fattelal.
• In 1977 Jagadguru Aadisankaran, a Malayalam film directed by P. Bhaskaran was released in which Murali Mohan plays the role of Adult Aadi Sankaran and Master Raghu plays childhood.
• In 1983 a film directed by G.V. Iyer named Adi Shankaracharya was premiered, the first film ever made entirely in Sanskrit language in which all of Adi Shankaracharya's works were compiled.Template:Citation needed The movie received the Indian National Film Awards for Best Film, Best Screenplay, Best Cinematography and Best Audiography.
• On 15 August 2013, Jagadguru Adi Shankara was released in an Indian Telugu-language biographical film written and directed by J. K. Bharavi and was later dubbed in Kannada with the same title, by Upendra giving narration for the Kannada dubbed version

See also

• Dakshinamurti Stotra
• Dwarka Kalika Pitha (West), Dwarka, Gujarat
• Adi Shri Gauḍapādāchārya
• Govardhan Peetham (East), Puri, Odisha
• Shri Govinda Bhagavatpadacharya
• Jnana Yoga
• Jyotirmath Peetham (North), Jyotirmath, Badrikashram, Uttarakhand
• Shri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu
• Pātañjalayogaśāstravivaraṇa
• Śānkarasmṛti (Laghudharmaprakrāśikā)
• Self-consciousness (Vedanta)
• Shivananda Lahari
• Shri Gaudapadacharya Math
• Soundarya Lahari
• Shri Sringeri Sharada Peetham (South), Sringeri, Karnataka
• Swami Vivekananda
• Vairagya
• Vivekachudamani
• Eka shlokiTemplate:Div col end

Sources

Printed sources

• Coromandel: A Personal History of South India{{#if:Allen|, Allen}. Little, Brown Book Group(2017). ISBN 978-1-4087-0540-7
• [{{{url}}} Conquest of the Four Quarters. TYraditional Accounts of the Life of Shankara]. Australian National University.
• [{{{url}}} Imagining Germany Imagining Asia: Essays in Asian-German Studies]. Boydell & Brewer.
• Śankara and the Buddhists. Journal of Indian Philosophy({Template:Year).
• The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upanisads. SUNY.
• [{{{url}}} The Origins of Vīraśaiva Sects]. Motilal Banarsidass.
• [{{{url}}} The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions]. Oxford University Press.
• [{{{url}}} Māyā in Radhakrishnanʾs Thought: Six Meanings Other Than Illusion]. Motilall Banarsidass.
• [{{{url}}} 'Tat Tvam Ast' in Context].
• [{{{url}}} A Tradition of Teachers: Śaṅkara and the Jagadgurus Today]. Motilall Banarsidas.
• The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita Vedanta{{#if:Chattopadhyaya|, Chattopadhyaya}. Sarup & Sons(2000). ISBN 81-7625-222-0
• The Daśanāmī-saṃnyāsīs. The Integration Of Ascetic Lineages Into An Order. BRILL.
• [{{{url}}} The Method of Early Advaita Vedānta: A Study of Gauḍapāda, Śaṅkara, Sureśvara, and Padmapāda]. Motilal Banarsidass.
• History of Indian Philosophy{{#if:Dasgupta|, Dasgupta}(1997)
• Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. University of Hawaii Press.
• The Essential Vedanta: A New Source Book of Advaita Vedanta. World Wisdom, Inc..
• Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions{{#if:Doniger|, Doniger}. Merriam-Webster(1999). ISBN 978-0-87779-044-0
• Handboek voor Yoga (Dutch translation; English title "Textbook of Yoga"){{#if:Feuerstein|, Feuerstein}. Ankh-Hermes(1978)
• [{{{url}}} Religion and Identity in South Asia and Beyond: Essays in Honor of Patrick Olivelle]. Anthem Press.
• A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. SUNY Press.
• [{{{url}}} The Vivekacudamani of Sankaracarya Bhagavatpada: An Introduction and Translation]. Ashgate.
• [{{{url}}} Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta]. SUNY Press.
• Studies in Kumarila and Sankara, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, Monographic 9{{#if:Halbfass|, Halbfass}. Reinbeck(1983)
• Tradition and Reflection: Explorations in Indian Thought{{#if:Halbfass|, Halbfass}. State University of New York Press(1990). ISBN 978-0-7914-0362-4
• Hinduism. In: Joseph Kitagawa, "The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture". Routledge.
• [{{{url}}} Kingship and Authority in South Asia]. Oxford University Press.
• Shankara and Indian Philosophy{{#if:Isaeva|, Isaeva}. State University of New York Press (SUNY)(1993). ISBN 978-0-7914-1281-7 Some editions spell the author Isayeva.
• Shankara and Indian Philosophy{{#if:Isayeva|, Isayeva}. State University of New York Press (SUNY)(1993). ISBN 978-0-7914-1282-4
• The Mind of Adi Shankaracharya{{#if:Keshava Menon|, Keshava Menon}(1976)
• [{{{url}}} Early Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism: The Mahayana Context of the Gaudapadiya-Karika]. SUNY Press.
• Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and 'The Mystic East'{{#if:King|, King}. Routledge(1999) Template:ISBN
• Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and 'The Mystic East'{{#if:King|, King}. Taylor & Francis e-Library(2001)Template:Full citation needed
• Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and 'The Mystic East'{{#if:King|, King}. Routledge(2002) Template:ISBN
• The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion{{#if:Koller|, Koller}. Routledge(2007). ISBN 978-1-134-18001-1
• [{{{url}}} Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion]. Routledge.
• [{{{url}}} Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion]. Routledge.
• [{{{url}}} Indian Transnationalism Online: New Perspectives on Diaspora]. Ashgate Publishing.
• [{{{url}}} A History of India]. Routledge.
• [{{{url}}} New Perspectives on Advaita Vedānta]. BRILL.
• [{{{url}}} A Thousand Teachings: The Upadeśasāhasrī of Śaṅkara]. State University of New York City Press.
• A thousand teachings : the Upadeśasāhasrī of Śaṅkara{{#if:Mayeda|, Mayeda}. Motilal Banarsidass(2006). ISBN 978-81-208-2771-4
• Adi Shankara, Mayeda, Sengaku. Encyclopedia Britannica.
• [{{{url}}} Seeing Through Zen. Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism]. The University Press Group Ltd.
• Advaita Vedanta. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
• Hinduism. Past and present{{#if:Michaels|, Michaels}. Princeton University Press(2004)
• [{{{url}}} Ancient Indian Education: Brahmanical and Buddhist]. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
• [{{{url}}} Indian Buddhism: A Survey with Bibliographical Notes]. Motilal Banarsidass.
• [{{{url}}} A History of Early Vedanta Philosophy. Part Two]. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. (Reprint of Shoki No Vedanta Tetsugaku, Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo)
• Krishna - A Sourcebook{{#if:Nelson|, Nelson}. Oxford University Press(2007)
• [{{{url}}} Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History]. Columbia University Press.
• [{{{url}}} Conquering the World, Subduing the Minds: Śaṅkara's digvijaya in the Local Context].
• Upaniṣads. Oxford University Press.
• [{{{url}}} Upaniṣads]. Oxford University Press.
• Life and Thought of Śaṅkarācārya{{#if:Pande|, Pande}. Motilal Banarsidass(2011). ISBN 978-81-208-1104-1
• Students' Britannica India, Volumes 1–5{{#if:Popular Prakashan|, Popular Prakashan}. Popular Prakashan(2000). ISBN 978-0-85229-760-5
• Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies Vol. II: Advaita Vedanta From 800 To 1200. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
• [{{{url}}} Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies Vol. III: Advaita Vedānta up to Śaṃkara and his pupils]. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
• Structural Depths of Indian Thought{{#if:Raju|, Raju}. SUNY Press(1985-01-01). ISBN 978-0-88706-139-4
• Accomplishing the Accomplished: The Vedas as a Source of Valid Knowledge in Sankara{{#if:Rambachan|, Rambachan}. University of Hawaii Press(1991). ISBN 978-0-8248-1358-1
• [{{{url}}} The Advaita Worldview: God, World, and Humanity]. State University of New York Press.
• Bhāmatī and Vivaraṇa Schools of Advaita Vedānta: A Critical Approach{{#if:Roodurmun|, Roodurmun}. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers(2002)
• Essential Hinduism. Greenwood Publishing Group.
• [{{{url}}} The Method of the Vedanta. A Critical Account of the Advaita Tradition]. Motilall Banarsidass.
• De Wortels van het Indiase Denken{{#if:Scheepers|, Scheepers}. Olive Press(2000)
• The Conception of Buddhist Nirvana{{#if:Shcherbatsky|, Shcherbatsky}. Motilal Banarsidass Publ.(1927). ISBN 9788120805293
• Paths to Transcendence: According to Shankara, Ibn Arabi & Meister Eckhart{{#if:Shah-Kazemi|, Shah-Kazemi}. World Wisdom(2006)
• A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy{{#if:Sharma|, Sharma}. Motilal Banarsidass(1997). ISBN 978-81-208-0365-7
• History of the Dvaita School of Vedānta and Its Literature: From the Earliest Beginnings to Our Own Times{{#if:Sharma|, Sharma}. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers(2000). ISBN 978-81-208-1575-9
• [{{{url}}} All About Hinduism]. The Divine Life Society.
• [{{{url}}} Śaivism in Philosophical Perspective: A Study of the Formative Concepts, Problems, and Methods of Śaiva Siddhānta]. Motilall Banarsidass.
• [{{{url}}} Polemics and Patronage in the City of Victory: Vyasatirtha, Hindu Sectarianism, and the Sixteenth-Century Vijayanagara Court]. University of California Press.
• Conflicting hagiographies and history: The place of Śaṅkaravijaya texts in Advaita tradition. International Journal of Hindu Studies({Template:Year).
• [{{{url}}} Śaṃkara's Advaita Vedānta: A Way of Teaching]. Routledge.
• Sankara Digvijaya – The traditional life of Sri Sankaracharya{{#if:Tapasyananda|, Tapasyananda}. Sri Ramakrishna Math(2015). ISBN 978-81-7823-342-0Template:Dead link
• On the Date of Maṇḍana Miśra and Śaṅkara and Their Doctrinal Relation. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute({Template:Date).
• Shankara and Buddhism. Journal of Indian Philosophy({Template:Year).
• Introduction. In: Tantra in practice{{#if:|, {{{last}}}}. Princeton University Press(2000)

Web citations

Further reading

• Jivanmukti in Transformation: Embodied Liberation in Advaita and Neo-Vedanta{{#if:Fort|, Fort}. SUNY Press(1998). ISBN 978-0-791-43904-3
• The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India{{#if:Fuller|, Fuller}. Princeton University Press(2004). ISBN 978-0-691-12048-5
• A Questioning Approach: Learning from Shankara's Pedagogic Techniques. Contemporary Education Dialogue({Template:Year).
• Śaṁkara's Arguments against the Buddhists. Philosophy East and West({Template:Date).
• A History of Early Vedanta Philosophy. Part One{{#if:Nakamura|, Nakamura}. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers(1990) (Reprint)
• Sankara and the Vedic Tradition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research({Template:Year).
• The Samnyasa Upanisads{{#if:Olivelle|, Olivelle}. Oxford University Press(1992). ISBN 978-0195070453
• History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization{{#if:Pandey|, Pandey}. Centre for Studies in Civilizations(2000)
• The Original Sankaracarya. Fohat({Template:Year).
• Dr. Richard de Smet and Sankara's Advaita. Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies({Template:Year).
• The Works of Sri Sankaracharya{{#if:|, {{{last}}}}. Sri Vani Vilas Press(1910) 20 vols.
• Śankara and Buddhism. Journal of Indian Philosophy({Template:Year).

External links

• Traditional biography of Shankara
• Template:Internet Archive author
• Template:Librivox author
• Template:Gutenberg author
• Works by Adi Shankara at sankaracharya.org

Template:Authority control